Does the conservation of energy require the "Cosmological Constant or Dark Energy?

both the big bang theory and the red shifting of light are ridicules.in fact, the very first thing we say of light is that it travels at a constant speed regardless of direction. the light from these distance galaxies travels at the same speed. the reduction in frequency is a loss of energy. the cos. constant(CC) is not constant. the back ground noise is the local CC. if the light actually cares about preserving our simple model of space time, i'm not certain. but whatever lies between the stars is there, what we call it will be determined at a later date.

Einstein indicated in his theory of General relativity that the Universe is a "Finite System" . If that is the case then the Universe is a closed conservative system.In summation that means that Mass ,Energy, Time and volume obey the laws of conservation.

There are some different scenarios that can cause a red shift in the wavelength(displacement oscillations) of light radiation.

One theory is J. RedBourne's Dispersion Theory. Another theory is that speed of light is not invariant in the Universe.

And of course Einstein's relativistic Doppler Effect.

Or Just a non relativistic Doppler Effect..

A 21st century explanation of the nature of light and its motion is Dr. Paul Marmet Theory of Light .

The Cosmological constant is really a forced function of the curvature of space describing an inverse area of Space.

The Einstein Cosmological Constant formulation is a follows;

L= [8 pi G /C^4 ] x Rho

L is the cosmological constant expressed as in units of per meter

squared.

G is Newton Universal gravitation constant

Rho is the Energy Density of Space in the containment of the Universe.

C is the average speed of light as measured relative to the earth as the frame of reference.

If the Energy Density of space is constant ,then it follows that the Cosmological Constant applies to a conservative system where the Law of Conservation of Energy applies.And the Power that holds Space into a structure is also a Constant.

It follows that if the Universe is a closed system ,Space does not need to expand. And the observations that indicate the recessions of certain Galaxies and expansion of their radius vector ,does exactly not mean that the containment volume of the Universe is increasing.

Thus the Physical Universe can be considered as a large Black Hole where Light cannot escape the Event Horizon.

Light is basically a moving flux of micromass . Light is neither electric or magnetic.

Energy is a phenomenon which is related to Time. Without time energy would not exist.

I wouldn't agree with the first sentence. What's wrong with light propagating off to infinity?

A cosmological constant is allowed by GR, and now recent evidence suggests that it is, in fact, necessary to reconcile our observations with the theory. But I don't see where a conservation of energy argument requires it. In any case, you have to be somewhat careful when talking about conservation of energy and cosmology. Conservation of energy isn't something you can assume a priori.

No. The lossless propagation of a photon (a quantum of electromagnetic energy) violates no known physical laws, and it doesn't require an expanding universe or a cosmological constant.