Bulls - Warriors trade - Another Stephen Jackson idea?

Bad trade for the Warriors. They give up one of the best guards in the league, and a guy who has a lot of potential for 2 average players. Salmons in solid, but nothing special. Thomas is talented, but he's a head case.

Why trade Deng for S Jax? (Other Answer) Deng is better, and younger. I would never do this trade because if I'm the BULLS gm. Tyrus has amazing leaps and a good jumper. Salmons is very talented, S Jax is old.if this were

Bulls get

Stephen Jackson

Warriors get

John Salmons

I'm fine. But I like Salmons a lot better than S Jax, after watching that game at the Palace..

As a Warriors fan, I do like Gordon, yet I liek Curry greater. Warriors organiztion pronounced a the beginning up of the season taht regardless of what takes place Curry would be staying put in his rookie 3 hundred and sixty 5 days. I dont suggestions paying for and advertising in basic terms Jackson for Prince and Gordon. Even tho i believe we are already set at that taking photos shelter slot. Detroit does prefer a center and Kaman does look like a solid in high-quality condition when you consider that Clippers already have Camby. i believe this commerce may well be intense-high quality if it replaced into in basic terms between Clippers and Pistons.

maybe a Deng/Jackson swap, if GS is dumb enough to do it. but they are not giving up Randolph in any trade that doesn't include the name Griffin.

no Jackson is way better than Salmons,

Randolph even now is way better than Tyrus

No way warriors do that

no way lol i didnt kno warriorz do tht

i agree wit evryone else hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

i think thats would help the arriors betta

No way!

NO WAY WARRIORS DO THAT