a question to an atheist, Can you provide at least one evidence for Creator or GOD does not exist?

Which god? You are the one that claims that this being exists, the burden of proof is on you.

No one has to prove that something does not exist, that it doesn't exist is self evident by the fact that there is no evidence that it exists, no evidence that any such thing could exist, no evidence that any such being is doing anything that has any effect on anything. There isn't even a definition of what this god is supposed to be. Which god do you refer to? Where does it exist, what does it do, where are the effects of what it does, what does it think, what does it think WITH, what does it concern it's self with, is it even particularly aware of us more than anything else in the universe?

There are a lot of complicated questions that would have to be answered to prove that god exists and what god is.

But to say that a god or anything else does not exist, requires only one thing, that there be no reason to think that it might:)

its nothing to do with seeing or not seeing it

i really wisht hat silly presumptuon would dissapear and logic and listening to the people when they speak replace it

I don’t believe in a religious expectation of a god because;

*There is no tangible evidence, the words and books of man are not evidence of anything other than man can speak and write down their words

teh bible is a book, that is all it is,like any and all other books, it has soem truth, soem facts, some names, and many non truths and wrong and impossibel information, and noen of which have been proven

however its contents are doubtful

because

men wrote the bible

men lie, make mistakes, mistranslates and misunderstand

several things in the bible that are told as truth have been disproved

science shows some of their claims to be impossible

*There are no measurable effects, and if there was a being the magnitude of a ‘god’, there would definitely be effects on our universe, on our world,

And if there was a being such as a god, the effects would be emmence,

*There are no supporting theorys or evidence mathematical or scientific, from any leading scientists, or philosophers or even religious scientists, even einsten could NOT prove the existence of any ‘god/creator’ (he did not believe in the religious personal god either ) and he tried to do this his whole life, he died having failed to

If there was any real way to prove a god/creators existence, I feel pretty confident in thinking einsten would have been one of those who COULD support it, even in a small way

*The religious description of a ‘god/creator’ is a sociological description, created by society and is based purely on psychology and has no basis in reality or probability

Ie, he is all powerful, all forgiving, all caring, is there for you your whole life,if you just ask, loves you when you feel unloved, helps you when you feel helpless, is there for you when you are alone, so you are never alone, and he even takes care of you in your ‘afterlife’ in a ‘heaven’, where you are rewarded for all your good in this life, and those who don’t believe or who were ‘bad’ are punished, so making believers feel secure, safe, loved, and having no fear of life nor death

*If there was a ‘god/creator’, it can not be the christian or religious expectation of a god

because it would also be affected by the universal laws , same as all life and energy in the universe , gravity, time, age, and even death would all affect this ‘god’ IF it was involoved in affecting our lives, ie causing miracles, answering prayers, making things happen, it would HAVE to come into our universal ‘bubble’ and ergo be affected by these laws

for this ‘god’ to be unaffected by these universal laws, would mean it can not and does not enter or affect our universe, in any way, it just sits watching, outside of our universal ‘bubble’ which it CANT enter, ever, so it can NOT make miracles happen, it can NOT answer prayers, it can NOT ever affect your life un any way, it just watches maybe even hears, but can not affect

effectively, it created us, but does not affect our existence in any way

That is the realistic logical, scientific being that we would call ‘a god’ or ‘a creator’

The man made version, is implausible and impossibe

i think that nature is the in basic terms right writer. each little thing that has been got here upon has a organic clarification that suits. we've never got here upon something supernatural that hasn't come from the mind's eye of human beings. i think of people who have faith in a God confuse existence that we see at present with the commencing up of existence. that's problematical to think of that existence in basic terms popped out of nowhere so particular human beings have faith that a God had to be the commencing up. regrettably it nevertheless would not incredibly answer who made God? non secular human beings will attempt to declare that God has continually existed. in case you may say that God has continually existed and does not want a writer, it form of feels honest to declare that nature has continually existed and does not want a writer. the kind is that all people believes in nature because of the fact all people is a witness to nature, yet to have faith in God demands mind's eye. God sound like a paranormal being that has human features. distinctive cultures have faith in distinctive Gods or maybe people who have faith interior the comparable God do not share the comparable opinion of who this God is strictly. even however non secular human beings do not opt to have faith that nature has performed all of it, that seems to be the least magical and maximum achieveable mechanism that all people can agree actual has data of latest. to place a paranormal being because of the fact the commencing up of each little thing is illogical.

Your logic is completely flawed. The burden of proof lies with you, since you are making some pretty hefty claims. I, personally, would like to meet the guy, or some other concrete evidence.

Don't give me the you can't see pain, but we believe in it, what a stupid thing to say. This has nothing to do with claiming that a supreme deity is out there, nothing.

No, pain is physically felt. Air is felt on our skin. God is not felt in anyway, people who claim to feel God don't know what they are talking about! Which God by the way? Zeus, Horus, Thor?

If God is powerful enough, he could make us all believe in him (he wants that doesn't he?) by giving us a proof beyond the shadow of doubt.

You want one item of evidence against the existence of a god. Well, the need to prove is yours as it is you who say that god exists. However, I shall bother in your case because you are obviously new to the world of facts (as apposed to fiction otherwise known as religion).

The total randomness of events. In any natural disaster, the chance of it happening in a Christian or Muslim or Hindu area are the same. Therefore there can be no bias from a supernatural moral mind.

Christians say that god moves in mysterious ways, yes so mysterious as to be indistinguishable from random chance.

Just one point from the many:

Do you think a god as you believe him to be (benevolent, omnipotent etc.) would CREATE something like this wasp, whose method of reproduction relies on it feeding off another LIVING organism?

Is there a point in all this suffering for the victim? Does the wasp have a higher purpose that it should kill everytime it produces larvae?

That's just stupid.

THERE IS KNOW PROFF THERE IS OR ISNT A GOD. and it really doesnt matter. if someone wants to believe in god great , if not thats great to. who cares if i do or dont in the end it makes know differance. as long as you believe in what you do dont try to force people one way or the other. everyone has the right to a religion including the right to chose to not have one. i know i didnt awnser you question. but worry about your self in the end every one will be happer then fighting a losing battle with people.

This is like asking as to divide 8 by adding 2, moron. First prove to me it's possible to prove a negative.

Air and pain are both demonstrable-- they react to things, they can be recorded, measured. Not even close to the same as your assertion of god.

*drink*

You cannot prove a negative. The burden of proof is always on the one who alleges that god DOES exist. Your logic is flawed. How does it tell you to believe in god?

Pain and air can be detected and measured. Can your god?