Who would win, The Brisbane Lions side of 2001, 2002 and 2003 or the geelong side of 2007-2009?

Brisbane by about 100 points. Seriously if t was those teams in te grand final against each other. Brisbane would literally tear them in two. they were to fast, to strong and just to skilled. Ablett wouldn't stand a chance and neither would any midfielders.

I'd probably say Brisbane's. They were very dominant for that large amount of time, and 3 brownlow medallists puts the icing on the cake. The Geelong midfield needs one more year i think.

Cats for sure...... they play a different kind of footy to what was played in 2001 - 2004....... they are faster and have more skill in the midfield..... many of you would disagree but look at stats and you can see the dominance of Geelong in comparison to Brisbane of those years...... before you make comment on this post I dare you to look at the stats first then make a decision.

Brisbane would win the game comfortably, Geelong would probz get first hands on the footy because their speed and skill are phenomenal , but Brisbane were so ferocious for the footy, that the geelong blokes who got the footy, would be buried into the ground so hard, they'd definitely think twice about going to get it the next time around, not only that, but brisbane had many more options up forward.

The Brisbane Lions

Whenever this question comes up I say Brisbane and I'll stick with them. The match-ups would be pretty interesting though. The battles in the midfield would be great to see, but I don't think Geelong would be able to stop both Brown and Lynch up forward.

brisbane by far

they would absolutely dominate them :D

maybe by about 4-5 goals

and to ryan up the top ^ ^ ^

brisbane had 2 winning brownlow medailists that were champion midfielders :D

Brisbane by 3 goals

Brisbane Lions would trash Geelong, :D

Ok mabey not trash but by like 3 to 5 goals. We had it all

It depends which year exactly 2007 Cats would win 2009 Cats would lose