yet another fantasy football trade?

I wouldnt, Cedric Benson is doing good, so is Reggie Wayne.

Frank Gore, when he comes back will be a beast do doubt.

Desean Jackson is decent, he's not so bad.

Tony Romo is one of the best QB's out there, better then Aaron For sure. The problem is dallas has no good WR's that tony can throw to.

Example - Today in the dallas game, that austine guy dropped a pass in the TD that tony threw, it should've been caught. Tony threw another one and austine caught it, he should of got a TD but a LB caught him, sad I know.

If Tony has better WR options I would say do it, to bad tony dont have WR's like Andre/Moss/Fitzgerald/Boldin haha or it'd be crazy.

Simple, decline the trade.

Great! Lost Romo, got Rodgers. Benson stepped up as a Bengal from when he was a Bear. And Reggie Wayne is great.

Romo is terrible please, don't pick him up.

How do we even know that Gore will continue his production?

The way Peyton has been playing and Wayne as the #1 you are actually considering this?

I'd keep the team that you have man it's good.Reggie Wayne has a bye next week and I'm not sure when Bensons is but Romo Gore and Jackson all still have their byes I think,actually I think Eagles already had theirs but yeah.

advantageous notice - those dilemmas at the instant are not so undesirable. From the attitude that there's no longer one god-undesirable determination you're able to be able to make. RB: You needless to say cant manage to pay for to drop Fargas. he's your 2d RB, with LJ injured you dont even have all people else to start it form of feels. Hes no longer so undesirable besides, getting via a strategies the vast majority of Oaklands incorporates. Make actual advantageous LJ is back and able to pass in the past beginning him. WR: Wayne and Housh is a huge a million-2 punch. i've got self assurance they are the two in the precise 5 at their place. Bobby Engram has emerged has Hasselbeck's pass-to guy besides. Ive picked him up as much as achieveable. He have been given countless seems final evening and that i swear he replaced into thrown to seventy 5% of the time against the Browns. Very stable #3. TE: slightly extra no longer difficulty-free, yet shall we be easy, how substantial is the TE spot? its if truth be told a crapshoot of wheter they'll score a TD or no longer. On that notice, I wouldnt be stunned to work out Chicago no longer sniff the readzone all week next week, making Olsen below efficient. LJ Smith has a much extra favorable matchup against the dismal Dolphins. ok: who cares? giving suggestion on that's if truth be told announcing i understand which team will score extra factors/get stopped in container purpose variety in the time of a stress extra. my gut says New England, yet relatively, who is familiar with? D: form of a toss up. I wouldnt p.c. to start a team against the Chiefs or Lions at this component in the season. See in case you could drop Olsen and %. up say Oakland, theyve have been given to be obtainable. against a Vikings O with out AP and with Brooks Bollanger on the helm, must be a extraordinarily stable matchup. The Raiders arent even all that undesirable. stable success

Sounds good to me; I always hate having injury-prone running backs even if they are good. Do this especially if you have some depth at RB.