So if evolution is false...?

it's not worth a discussion, they wont accept FACTS, they'd rather have faith on something that does not even exist

RatDogRulesTheWorld>

How do you know a virus never has? Have you been around watching since dawn of life on Earth? Human history is about 10,000 years old and out of that only the last 300 years have been time when we can watch, record and study microbiology.

And if you know anything at all about the Theory it takes hundreds of thousands to millions of years

But you forget it is survival of the fittest...not survival of the higher lifeform. Viruses are very successful and can live and thrive in places that would kill any animal...so why would they need to evolve to a new form...oh wait they do all the time with their evolving resistance to our drugs.

As for missing links.....if you understood the Theory there is no real missing link as there would be countless since Evolution is about gradual change...so the changes would be so small that there would be no "missing link" which is one reason why people who argue about a missing link show they have not fully understood what the Theory is about.

Anyway could have been a lab, could have been God, could have been Devil, could have been a guy named bob who lives on the moon and can just really hold his breath for a really long time and has a knack for finding loopholes in nature's laws.

Either way I don't ask you to close your eyes and "praise Darwin" and any idea that is what science wants shows a vast ignorance of this space-time reality.

What I ask is that 1) know what your talking about before you start arguing..or at least be up front about not knowing what the issue really is (again by your own words you obviously do not have a clear understanding of Evolution or what it actually says and/or means) and 2) If you do not have a better idea with better evidence behind it to replace Evolution with then get off your butt and go find one if you hate Evolution so much

OR we could look at a third option and ask why this disease was made in a laboratory, and what do they have to gain by unleashing it on us? Who benefits and whose agendas are fulfilled by depopulation?

OR we could stick our heads in the sand and praise Darwin.

OR we could ask if a virus can mutate at a rate far beyond humans, why there has never been a virus that has EVOLVED into ANYTHING higher than itself, like say...an earthworm. Just a different mutation of the same organism, a virus. Shouldn't that be impossible according to the "theory" of evolution.

OR we could ask why every time evolutionary scientists claim they have found the missing link it is later proven not to be so? And why, if it took millions of years and "theoretically" billions upon billions of missing links to make the jump from ape to human, have we not found a single skeleton yet. And yet we find an endless amount of other fossils from the same time period? Shouldn't that be extremely improbable at the very least? That's not very scientific if you ask me...

OR why micro evolution had to be scraped from macro evolution because so many missing links are just not in the fossil record. Where did they all go? Perhaps his Holiness Darwin removes them to see if you will be true to your faith in spite of all the evidence to the contrary.

And of course macro evolution is infinitely MORE unlikely than micro evolution scientifically speaking. Maybe the fact that the theory must constantly "evolve" to fill the tremendous holes in the facts is finally proof that evolution (of some sort) does actually exist...

OR I could go on forever.

Good luck with your point...

evolution exist because time exist... the more you eat the bigger and more energy you get..

I am with Cupcakes. ROFL

that's a good point

He did it for the sh**s and giggles.