Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

So I guess the Broncos are not for real after all....?

I kinda figured with Kyle Orton at QB they couldnt be too real but losing to the Skins proved my theory.

That is so weak. I know Orton didnt play the whole game but even if he did I doubt it would have made a difference. They cant expect to be a legit playoff team losing to one of the worst teams in the NFL.

Awesome.

4 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Kyle can do it!! The coulda pulled it out! Losing your starting QB can never be overrated on the game impact, defense on the field longer, reduced playbook, more pressure on the running back, INTs, etc! whooee!! let's go BRONCOS

    Source(s): native of CO, home of coors and the broncos. elway, back to back baby!!!
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    you can't count cross country games to mean anything. that game started at 10am west coast time. the cardinals made the superbowl last year, and lost everytime they made the trip to the east coast until the playoffs. i like the broncos, but i took the redskins and the points because it happens almost EVERY time.

  • And 1
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    Broncos and Cowboys proved to be posers. Bengals? I guess they are fo real

  • Dragon
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    yea back to back jeff..

    back to back choking away the divison seasons.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.