Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Shell Projected up a Hill?
A shell is projected with initial velocity v at an angle α to the horizontal from a point that is at the foot of a hill inclined with angle φ to the horizontal, where
0 < φ < α < π/2
Find the distance to where the shell reaches the ground measured up the face of the hill.
And find the angle α, that achieves maximum range for a given initial velocity v.
I appreciate the thoughtful attention this question has received from people who know more math than me.
There is general agreement on the second part of the question, the optimal angle at which to fire the projectile. And I concur.
The answers to the first part of the question, the slant distance up the hill, do not appear to agree. And I'm havinig some trouble working thru each of the answers to resolve the disagreement.
6 Answers
- WaheedLv 61 decade agoFavorite Answer
Let the the horizontal from a point that is at the foot of a hill is 0,0 (origin)
The line on the surface of the hill slope will be y = tan φ x
The shell will be at point x,y at any time t , so that x = v cos α t and y = v sin α t - 0.5 g t^2
we get t = x / ( v cos α)
y =( v sin α) x / ( v cos α) - 0.5 g ( x / ( v cos α) )^2
y = x tan α - 4.905 x^2 / ( v cos α)^2 this parabola will intersect y = tan φ x
so that tan φ x = x tan α - 4.905 x^2 / ( v cos α)^2
tan φ = tan α - 4.905 x / ( v cos α)^2
4.905 x / ( v cos α)^2 = tan α - tan φ
x = ( tan α - tan φ ) ( v cos α)^2 / 4.905
y = tan φ ( tan α - tan φ ) ( v cos α)^2 / 4.905
distance to where the shell reaches the ground measured up the face of the hill. = ( x^2 + y^2)^0.5=s=
=[ {( tan α - tan φ ) ( v cos α)^2 / 4.905}^2 + { tan φ ( tan α - tan φ ) ( v cos α)^2 / 4.905}^2]^0.5
ans
for max s, ds /dα = 0
- Scythian1950Lv 71 decade ago
This one has the interesting answer:
α = Ï/4 + Ï/2
for maximum range, as measured on the ground up the hill.
When I get time, I'll explain how this was arrived. It's a nice and simple result, giving Ï/4 for flat ground, and Ï/2 (obviously!) for vertical faces.
Edit: Dr D, very nice, short and sweet derivation. I don't think I can top that. But I will try, nonetheless.
Edit 2: If we use the generalized equation of parabolic trajectory, where s = Tan(α), which is of the form:
-(1/2)(1+s²)x² + sx
and then add an infinitesimal âs to s, i.e., the trajectory of a shell shot slightly steeper, the two trajectories meet at a point which is at an angle 2α - Ï/2, which is does lead to the same result as above. In other words, consider the family of parabolic trajectories that a shell makes shot at varying angles from 45° to 90°, which envelope forms a curve, which is another parabola (1/2)(1 - x²). The intersection of the line Tan(Ï) x with this curve marks the point where the parabolic trajectory passing through it has the maximum range for the given hill slope angle Ï. It is the null point.
(For those that still find this reasoning vague, first consider an arbitrary slope intersecting the envelope curve. Then any parabolic trajectory NOT passing through this intersection point will intersect the slope line at a distance less than to the original intersection point.)
Edit 3: Given v, g, the equation of the envelope curve is:
(1/2)( v²/g - (g/v²)x² )
Given Ï, the distance from (0,0) to intersection with the envelope curve is:
(v²/2g) (Csc(Ï/4 + Ï/2))² THIS IS THE ANS YOU SEEK!
Given α, the distance from (0,0) to where the trajectory parabola is tangent to the envelope curve is:
(v²/2g) (Csc(α))²
which is to be entirely expected, since α = Ï/4 + Ï/2.
Edit 4: For v = 100 m/s, g = 9.8 m/s², Ï = 20° and α = 55°, we have:
(v²/2g) (Csc(Ï/4 + Ï/2))² = (v²/2g) (Csc(α))² = 760.352 m
See 2nd link for this specific example.
Edit 5: By differentiating Steve's range equation, the maximum as a function of α is (v²/2g) (Csc(α))², so there is agreement.
Source(s): http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/hh120/Scythian1... http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/hh120/Scythian1... - Al PLv 71 decade ago
Everyone used up all the good stuff.
You forced me to create a new
planet.
I'm putting my projectiles on Planet Slope
where the gravitational field is slanted
and Earthlings (including Newton) cannot
catch apples falling out of trees. This is
a simple place. There are no hills, and for
some reason they always fire shots against
the gravitational "wind".
g = 1, v = 1
Φ = θ-Ï
R = vx(θ,Ï) * t(Φ,Ï)
vx = v * Cosθ / CosÏ ==>v* "velocity ratio"
Flight time given the strange gravitational
field on this planet:
T = 2 * v * sinΦ / (g * cosÏ)
Range on flat ground.
R = vx* T
R = [v * Cosθ / CosÏ] * [2 * v * sinΦ / (g * cosÏ]
R = [v * Cosθ / CosÏ] * [2 * v * sin[ θ-Ï] / (g * cosÏ]
R = 2 * cosθ * sin(θ-Ï) / cosÏ^ 2
R = [2/cosÏ^ 2] * cosθ * sin(θ-Ï)
dR/dθ = [2/cosÏ^ 2] * cosθ * sin(θ-Ï) = 0
==>
dR/dθ = [2/cosÏ^ 2] * cos(2θ-Ï) =0
cos(2θ-Ï) = 0
arcos[cos(2θ-Ï)] = arccos[0]
2θ-Ï = 90
2θ = 90 + Ï
θ = α = Ï/4 + Ï/2
Many nice answers above me.
______________________
Edit: Let's put some numbers to it:
Launch angle = 45+20/2 = 55
a = 55 >>launch angle relative to ground
b = 20 >>hill angle
g = 9.8 m/s^2
v = 100 m/s
R = (2 * v ^ 2 * cos(a) * Sin(a - b)) / (g * cos(b) ^ 2)
R = 487 m
Change the launch angle to (+/- 5) degrees for example
and R will drop to about: 475 m
Edit:
Trying reconcile the other equations with my numbers
Using Steve's equation I get:
R = (v ^ 2 / g)*Sin(2 * 55)*(1 - Tan(20) / Tan(55))*1/Cos(20)
R = Steve = 487m
R = 2v ^ 2 / g (Tan(55) - Tan(20)) / (Cos(20) / Cos(55) ^ 2)
R = Dr.D = 487m
Can't seem to reconcile all?
______________________
Edit: Scythian, your last equation gives me:
D = v ^ 2 / (2 g) (1 / Sin(55)) ^ 2
= 487 m
Btw, thanks for teaching me something about
envelope curves.
- ?Lv 71 decade ago
Since neither Scythian or Doc D explicitly answered the first part of the question, I will chime in with:
Slant Range Rs = (V²/g)*sin(2α)*(1 - cotα*tanÏ)*secÏ
This one is good for any angle α & Ï within the range specified in the question. Check the link below for some caveats to this equation........
Source(s): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trajectory - How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Dr DLv 71 decade ago
REWRITTEN:
Let us work in polar cordinates. r and θ are the variables and α is the initial angle of trajectory.
y = -gsec^2 α / (2v^2) * x^2 + x* tanα
Sub y = rsinθ and x = rcosθ
tanα - tanθ = (g/2v^2) * rcosθ sec^2 α .. (1)
For a given θ = Ï, we wish to find the α which maximizes r (with θ constant).
Differentiate with respect to α and set dr/dα = 0
We end up with 1 = grcosθ tanα / v^2
Sub in eqn (1) to get
tan(2α) = -1/tan(Ï)
tan(2α) = -tan(90 - Ï) = tan(180 - [90 - Ï]) = tan(90 + Ï)
Therefore 2α = 90 + Ï
α = 45 + Ï/2
which is the same result Scythian got.
The value of r this gives us is
r = v^2 /(g cosÏ tanα)
= (v^2 /g) * sec(Ï) * cot(Ï/2 + 45)
which simplifies rather nicely to
r = (v^2 /g) / [sin(Ï/2) + cos(Ï/2)]^2
= v^2 /[g (1 + sinÏ)]
**EDIT**
According to my eqn (1) we can get the distance r
r = (2v^2 /g) * (tanα - tanÏ) / (cosÏ sec^2 α)
After some trig manipulations, I'm finding that this answer matches with Steve's, FGR's, Waheed's as well as Al P's (except that Al P's θ is my α).
- 1 decade ago
I changed the coordinates to r and s where r is the distance along the slope and s is the perpendicular distance from the slope.
r = v cos(α - Ï) t - 1/2 g sinÏ t^2
s = v sin(α - Ï) t - 1/2 g cosÏ t^2
set s= 0
t = 2v/g sin(α - Ï) / cosÏ ... (t = 0 is discarded)
r = v cos(α - Ï) (2v/g sin(α - Ï) / cosÏ) - 1/2 g sinÏ (2v/g sin(α - Ï) / cosÏ)^2
r = 2v^2/(g*cosÏ) * (cos(α - Ï) sin(α - Ï)) - (sin(α - Ï))^2 tanÏ)
dr/dα = 2v^2/(gcosÏ) * (cos2(α - Ï) - sin2(α - Ï) * tanÏ)
set dr/dα = 0
0 = dr/dα = (cos2(α - Ï) - sin2(α - Ï) * tanÏ)
0 = 1 - tan2(α - Ï) tanÏ
α = 1/2 atan(1/tanÏ) + Ï
α = 1/2 (Ï/2 - Ï) + Ï
α = Ï/4 +1/2 Ï
The max angle is independent of velocity (as it should be). It just stretches out or decreases the shape of the parabola.
*******Addendum********
I find it interesting that you have 5 very good answers and each with a unique method of solving this problem.