If "climate change" is a settled science, why have scientists been so reluctant to release the data they use?

Question

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704342404574576683216723794.html

'In 2004, retired businessman Stephen McIntyre asked the National Science Foundation for information on various climate research that it funds. Affirming "the importance of public access to scientific research supported by U.S. federal funds," the Foundation nonetheless declined, saying "in general, we allow researchers the freedom to convey their scientific results in a manner consistent with their professional judgment."

Which leaves researchers free to withhold information selectively from critics, as when CRU director Phil Jones told Australian scientist Warwick Hughes in a 2005 email: "Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it."'

Does this seem like a "settled science" to you?

RonJon · Accepted Answer

Because if they have a "disaster" then they will get funded and keep their jobs.  If they don't, then they lose the funding and therefore their jobs.

"Republicans invented Climate Change my friend." - LOL

? · Answer

My wide-unfold quote I heard somebody say that's that's like throwing your infants's photograph away with the intention to shop closet area. you do no longer toss something powerful away to shop so little room. Edit: Trevor. do a sprint diagnosis. that's not a lie. That actuality which you worked with the information exhibits that Jones is the guy who's mendacity and could be investigated by using the police. If what you assert is real (which you have worked with the information), he has committed against the regulation by using deleting them, or no longer freeing them below the British Freedom of information Act. Edit: Trevor i've got self belief you. If what you assert is real then Jones is definitely no longer mendacity yet isn't telling us the finished tale. He did certainly sell off the information (he basically did no longer let us know that it replaced into after it replaced into copied directly to computers). They now no longer carry the information is likewise real. He basically did no longer point out that that's held by using the Met place of work.

Forget War Buy More · Answer

No science is settled.  Even Einstein's theory of relativity (E=MC2) is still only a theory.  That's the whole idea behind it.  Very few things are actually settled and it has to be absolutely concrete--like gravity.

Anonymous · Answer

It's Global Warming. Republicans invented Climate Change my friend.

See Frank Luntz, Bush climate adviser, Republican, and Inventor of Climate Change.

Anonymous · Answer

Liberals don't like the truth

Trending News

If "climate change" is a settled science, why have scientists been so reluctant to release the data they use?

5 Answers