Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Librarians: Which library hires librarians the most: Academic or Public?

I am undecided if I should go the academic route or the public library route. Whenever I do job searches for Librarian positions it seems as if Academic Library jobs are more plentiful. What do you think?

2 Answers

Relevance
  • Bill P
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Having worked in both college and public libraries, it's going to vary very much, based on the size of the library and the specific economic situation. A large academic library system, with lots of subject specialists/bibliographers (think of large state universities, Ivy League schools, etc.) will have more librarians at any given time and, presumably, more turnover over time. Likewise for large public libraries, which may staff branches, have their own subject specialists (think business, genealogy, electronic resources, and so on), etc.

    Smaller libraries of either type may be more likely to have only a few professional librarians and less "churn" in their staffing.

    Like much of the rest of the job market, the librarian field is a tough one to break into right now. Budgets for the creation of new positions are very tight and librarians who might have been about to retire a few years ago are holding on until their portfolios improve.

    That said, it does look right now that academics are doing a bit more hiring than publics. If you visit the ALA JobList board today (12/12), it shows 96 positions requiring masters' or above in academic libraries, while only 30 in publics (this clearly is only a sample of what might actually be out there).

    http://joblist.ala.org/

    Obviously, though, the wider you can cast your net, the better. If you feel suited to do either type of library, I'd keep looking at both. If you've got geographic flexibility, that helps even more. Keep in mind that, in this job market, part-time positions might give you a good foot in the door (although the benefits part can be tough).

    Good luck!

    --Bill Pardue

    Arlington Heights Memorial Library http://www.ahml.info/

    Librarians--Ask Us, We Answer!

    Find your local Library at http://www.publiclibraries.com/

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I'm here in Pittsburgh, and the school's not hiring librarians, as they're cutting down "related arts" and expanding reading, reading intervention specialists, and mathematics teachers. At the same time, the Carnegie Libraries are talking about closing a bunch of branches. Maybe it's not like that around the country.

    Additionally, don't become a school librarian if you don't want to teach. Being and librarian and being a school librarian are 2 different things, like night and day. The school will fill your day up with classes. As a teacher, I would consider becoming a librarian in a public library, but I would not at a school. School librarians have it tough, because you're treated as a prep period for the other teachers, so likely you'll see students once a week, and never get to know them well enough to even gain a useful learning environment.

    Source(s): Wanderer
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.