Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Clearly there are limits to the uses of skepticism.?
But the issue is tricky. Imagine that you enter a big-city taxicab and the moment you get settled in, the driver begins a harangue about the supposed iniquities and inferiority's of another ethnic group. Is your best course to keep quiet, bearing in mind that silence conveys assent? Or is it your moral responsibility to argue with him, to express outrage, even to leave the cab because you know that every silent assent will encourage him next time? Likewise, if we offer too much silent assent about mysticism and superstition, even when it seems to be doing a little good, we abet a general climate in which skepticism is considered impolite, science tiresome, and rigorous thinking somehow stuffy and inappropriate. Figuring out a prudent balance takes wisdom. Your thoughts?
8 Answers
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
it is important to find a balance between when to say something and when not to say something.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
What does skepticism have to do with bigotry? Your example seems more than a bit strained...
In the cab, I'd simply tell the guy to just drive, not talk. He can have his opinion if he wants to, but keeping it to himself is a good thing.
I would probably most often do the same thing if a cab driver (or anyone else) starting going on about their religion without being asked -- I'd simply suggest they concentrate on their job, and keep their mouths shut. They have every right to believe whatever they want to -- but I don't need to hear why they think their superstition is better than all the others. The only people who consider skepticism impolite or science tiresome are those who either know nothing about it or who ignore it in favor of superstition...I would consider the odds of me getting them to change their minds during a cab ride (or any other short social interaction) pretty long, and so probably wouldn't bother to press the point. Save the rational arguments for appropriate forums -- like here for example :)
Peace.
- 1 decade ago
I think that first of all you are lying. And second of all that your disdain for other people's intelligence is a chore for you to contain. Anybody else here see this ?
Scepticism isn't even what you are describing. Scepticism goes BOTH ways and you clearly are not even allowing one of those ways. Any ethnic group -- ANY-- has its iniquities and inferiorities. That is a fact. You are only complicit when real flesh and blood people are being maligned. Why can't you se that ? I think you can but I won't be uncharitable and say I know for sure.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
It's generally best to keep quiet around these Nut Cases.
But if it gets too bad, I will leave any situation that gets to the point of Dogmatic Rantings.
I try to make clear that I'm not interested in hearing these tirades. Sometimes I will challenge them.
But it does little good to change their way of thinking.
- navoltLv 45 years ago
What stable might your outrage do? enable him comprehend which you hit upon his perspectives unacceptable? no longer basically are you in his care, you're additionally relatively a customer in his cab. that may no longer polite, despite in case you hit upon his jokes or perspectives distasteful. and that i'm hardly ever able to refuse to 'assent' to his top to have distasteful perspectives. Who do i think of i'm?
- Uncle ThesisLv 71 decade ago
Pretty heavy for xmas eve.
You offer only 2 options.
Are there really only 2 options?
- 1 decade ago
Your question has nothing to do with skepticism. Skepticism is the practice of questioning truth, even the truth of matters long held to be obvious.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Tactfulness is key.
Source(s): agnostic-atheist