Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Ali asked in Science & MathematicsEngineering · 1 decade ago

Fluid mechanics problem?

Update:

A partly full water tank admits water at 20°C and 85 N/s

weight flow while ejecting water on the other side at 5500

cm3/s. The air pocket in the tank has a vent at the top and

is at 20°C and 1 atm. If the fluids are approximately incompressible,

how much air in N/h is passing through the

vent? In which direction?

1 Answer

Relevance
  • tigger
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I think this question is simply about relating the volume of inflow to the volume of outflow. Working in SI units, the rate of volume of inflow is -

    Vin = m*rho where m is the mass rate, and rho is the density of water (1000kg/m^3)

    Vin = 85/(rho*g) = 8.66*10^-3 m^3/s

    Outflow = Vout = 5.5*10^-3 m^3/sec

    Inflow exceeds outflow by 3.16m^3/s This is the rate at which air leaves the tank. To find the mass flow rate of air you must multiply this volume flow rate by the density of air. (Google 'density of air' to find this). Note that to get an accurate result you must find a value for the density for air of 100% relative humidity - not dry air)

    Finally, to find the weight flow rate you multiply mass flow rate by g (9.81m/s^2)

    I am tempted to comment that N/sec is a bizarre way of specifying a flow rate. Force per second seems very odd in this context !!

    Rate of change of force with time is a quantity that has some meaning, but it does not seem to me to be the best way to characterise a rate of low of a quantity of material with respect to time; mass or volumetric flow rate would be better. Using N/s in this way suggests a re-emergence of that old problem of the confusion of force with mass, and the tendency to treat them as equivalent quantities, for which of course there is no justification at all !!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.