Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
If you were to rank past Wrestlemanias based on....?
putting them into 5 year groups (1-5, 6-10, 11-15, 16-20, 21-25) how would you rank them? Here are mine:
1. 16-20 There wasn't a bad WM among the 5
2. 21-25 21,22, 23 were great but 24 & 25 were some of the worst only having one decent match each so I had to drop this to 2nd
3. 6-10 These had some great matches but some bad shows too
4. 1-5 WM 1 &2 were just horrid
5. 11-15 11, 13 & 15 were really bad so the last grouping was no contest. I had the misfortune of seeing 15 live.
LOL, yes I know all about starrcade, I am a huge NWA fan after all, but that is not what this question is about
2 Answers
- oldscholl88Lv 71 decade agoFavorite Answer
1. 1-5 WM 1 and 2 really don't hold up but 3,4 , and 5 were all very good
2. 6-10 - 6 was great but 7,8, and 9 all had a couple of good matches but weren't very good shows. Remember the early 90s was a drought in wrestling. However I would rank 10 as one of the all time best manias
3. 11-15 - I think 11 was one of the worse mania's ever. I liked 13 but I thought 14 was great. !5 was not very good but Austin and Rock had a great main event
4. 16-20- 16 was good, 17 is the best ppv of all time, 18 had some great moments(Hogan vs Rock), 19 had some great matches, 20 was good but could have been better
5. 21-25 - All of these manias were lacking to me. However there was usually one or two great matches each year
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Might i mention Starrcade?