Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Disk Integration to find Moment of Inertia?
A disk of radius r_o and mass m has a hole in the center of radius r_i. It is spun around its center point, much like a CD. Use calculus to derive an expression for the moment of inertia of the disk/ring.
After a number of steps, I ended up with I = .5πρh(r_o⁴ - r_i⁴)
However, this seems to be wrong and I am not quite sure where, exactly, I went wrong. Any help is appreciated. Thanks. :-)
3 Answers
- MadhukarLv 71 decade agoFavorite Answer
Your answer is correct beyond doubt.
Consider a thin ring of width dx at a distance x from the center of the ring, r_i < x < r_o.
The moment of inertia of this thin ring is
dI = (2πx*t*ρ)*x^2 dx, where, t = thickness and ρ = density
Integrating,
Moment of inertia, I
= (2π*t*ρ)* [x^4/4] (x = r_i to r_o)
= 0.5πρt(r_o^4 - r_i^4).
If you need the answer in terms of mass, m
m = πρt(r_o^2 - r_i^2).
=> moment of inertia
I = 0.5 m (r_o^2 + r_i^2).
Alternate method:
Using the formula for moment of inertia of the disc,
I = (1/2)m1*r_0^2 - (1/2)m2*r_i^2
where
m1 = mass of the disc having radius r_o = 0.5πρt*r_o^2
and
m2 = mass of the disc having radius r_i = 0.5πρt*r_i^2
=> I = 0.5 m (r_o^2 + r_i^2), same as what you had got.
This is then coverted in terms of mass of the annular ring, m as
I = 0.5 m (r_o^2 + r_i^2).
- Anonymous5 years ago
Suppose you had thre masses "m" located at r1=1 ,r2 = 2 & r3 = 3. The moment of inertia is; I = m(1) + m(4) + m(9) = 14m Now suppose the same three masses were all located at r = 3. The moment of inertia would be; I = (3m)(9) = 27m As you can see the top one is approximately half the bottom one. Its just how the summation works out when the mass is distributed between 0 & R as compared to all "bunched" up at R.