Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Why is the Wikimedia Foundation trying to turn Wikipedia into a news organization?
Wikipedia is supposedly "the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit", but it now appears that the WMF wants it to be a news organization, too. In its newly released 2008-2009 Annual Report, the WMF extolls Wikipedia's reportage of the 2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks (pp. 10-11), and crows over its website traffic as compared to six news media websites (pp. 20-21) (three other reference sites are also mentioned). Further, the WMF's "Strategy Task Force" is questioning the continued existence of Wikinews, given the prevalence of "topical content" already on Wikipedia. What is going on here?
5 Answers
- Robert SLv 41 decade agoFavorite Answer
When you have a website that millions of gullible people believe in blindly, you want to increase your power. It's as simple as that.
- 1 decade ago
Wikipedia is not a news service.
Wikipedians regularly recognize that this is the role of Wikinews; it's on the list of things Wikipedia is Not. But Wikinews language versions haven't grown in # of contributors or articles the way that Wikipedia and Wiktionary have... so there is still more news writing/reporting on Wikipedia that on Wikinews. The Wikimedia Foundation (which has no say in where contributors write) doesn't have much to do with that.
Current Events has always been a core part of Wikipedia, since the earliest debates about how to include breaking events on the main page. (I believe one of the pages with the largest # of historical edits is still what used to be the sole top-level 'Current Events' page...) Wikipedia is regularly cited as an important place for news when crises hit -- not for any traditional-style 'reporting' (which wikinews gets much better) but because they will quickly have a page for every central aspect of a crisis event -- either a section in a list of major tornadoes, or an article about the historical event of an explosion.
Source(s): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Current_events http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:How_the_Cur... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipe... - 1 decade ago
Short answer - why not?
As long as the quality of the information provided does not suffer, I see no problem with this. When news organizations are owned by fewer and fewer entities, many of whom have other agendas (msn for example), Wikipedia is fast becoming the only source of information I can trust.
It does mean, though, that Wikipedia will require more and more wiki-editors (everyone is welcome to learn how at Wikipedia). And, BTW it is not the Wikimedia foundation that is driving this, it is the tens of thousands of wiki-editors who decide what needs writing about.
- jasonLv 51 decade ago
wikipedia is all about money.
it's also a cult and a mmorpg of a sorts.
they try to pawn it off as this wonderful place where information is free, but it's all about making jimmy $$$