Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

do you believe in the death penalty?

29 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Yes

  • 1 decade ago

    I’m against the death penalty but not out of sympathy for criminals. The death penalty isn’t an effective way to prevent or reduce crime, it costs a whole lot more than life in prison, and worst of all, risks executions of innocent people.

    The worst thing about it. Errors:

    The system can make tragic and irreversible mistakes. In 2004, Cameron Todd Willingham was executed in Texas for starting the fire that killed his children. Multiple forensic experts have since found that the arson "science" his conviction was based on was actually just junk science. As of today, 139 wrongly convicted people who were sentenced to death have been exonerated. DNA, is rarely available in homicides and can’t guarantee we won’t execute innocent people. Obviously, if someone is convicted and later found innocent you can release him from prison, but not from the grave.

    Crime reduction (deterrence):

    The death penalty doesn't stop others from committing murder. Homicide rates are consistently higher in states and regions with the death penalty than in those without it. The most recent FBI data confirms this.

    Keeping killers off the streets for good:

    Life without parole, on the books in 49 states (all except Alaska), also prevents reoffending. It means what it says, and spending 23 of 24 hours a day locked in a tiny cell is no picnic. Two advantages:

    -an innocent person serving life can be released from prison

    -life without parole costs less than the death penalty

    Costs, a surprise to many people:

    The death penalty is much more expensive than life in prison. The high costs of the death penalty are for the complicated legal process, with the largest costs at the pre-trial and trial stages. The point is to avoid executing innocent people. There are tremendous expenses in a death penalty case whether or not the defendant is convicted, let alone sentenced to death.

    Who gets it:

    Contrary to popular belief, the death penalty isn't reserved for the worst crimes, but for defendants with the worst lawyers. It doesn't apply to people with money. When is the last time a wealthy person was on death row, let alone executed?

    Victims:

    People assume that families of murder victims certainly want the death penalty imposed. It just isn't so. Some are against it on moral grounds. But even families who have supported the death penalty in principle have testified that the drawn-out death penalty process is painful for them and that life without parole is an appropriate alternative.

    It comes down to whether we should keep a system for the sake of retribution or revenge even though it isn’t effective in reducing violent crime, costs much more than alternatives and, worst of all, can lead to the nightmare of executing someone for a crime he didn’t commit.

  • 1 decade ago

    No. Death is the easy way out for the criminal. If they did something horrible, like killing people, they deserve a lifetime of hardship in prison- if they die, it's just more death happening. And that defeats the purpose. Because then, technically, the person who performed the death penalty should be punished too, and that's just not right. We don't need more murder in our world!

  • 1 decade ago

    I think the way we go about it (in America) is a lengthy and expensive waste of taxpayer money. I think we should be allowed to torture them and make them as miserable as possible in life, including chemical castration, in order not only to appease the families of their victims but because we have no idea what happens after death, how do we know the death penalty is really a penalty and not a relief?

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I do and don't. To a degree I fear that it would become a slippery slope. The death penalty becoming more and more relaxed until you get the chair for something as mild as shop lifting.

    But I do have to say, certain people (such as rapists or serial killers) deserve the death penalty if not a little more then that.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    only if they're absolutely certain they've got the right guy. otherwise they could be killing innocent people while the real criminal is still free.

    also, it is arguable that a life sentance is worse, as then you are being punished for a number of years. with the death penalty you die and that's it.

  • 1 decade ago

    No. For one thing I believe life in prison sounds worse than death. For another just think, and it's happened before, what if you executed someone who was innocent? That HAS happened many times in the past. I don't think it's our decision to decide who dies.

  • Yes.

  • 1 decade ago

    Not really. The idea sounds okay, but when you get down to it, it's far worse to have to suffer alone living with what you did than to be put out of your misery.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Yes I do, and I am a Liberal. If someone murdered or molested anyone in my family. I would either hunt them down myself, or want them executed.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.