Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
5 Answers
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
It saves 100% of the quality
Jpeg at lowest compression has also good quality, but you can't use them if you want to edit/adjust colors in photoshop
- 1 decade ago
You have to convert your RAW to some other format in in order to print, share, post or do anything else with it. TIF is a lossless format and will not degrade the image. TIF's are a much larger file and are very difficult to post and share online. JPEG compresses the image and the image will degrade slightly every time you save or move the file. 1st generation JPEG (1st save) are still very high quality and I use them all the time for printing, even up to poster size.
Don't ever get rid of the RAW file. If you ever want to modify the photo, you will want to go back to the RAW. Do not modify JPEG's, or TIF's, you will not get as good as quality.
- TobascoLv 51 decade ago
As far as what you see on the screen (or on paper, if you print it), no, nothing is lost.
What is lost is a whole lot of exposure information your computer can use when you edit. So TIF is a good form to convert to from RAW if you're printing, or if you plan on moving/saving the file around a lot.
For web uses though, JPG is the undisputed king.
- PolyhistorLv 71 decade ago
Not much is lost in converting to tif, but a substantial amount is lost going to jpg.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.