Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

beast
Lv 5
beast asked in SportsBasketball · 1 decade ago

do u think kobe wouldn't have won his first 3 rings without shaq? (why or why not?)?

9 Answers

Relevance
  • Eddie
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    No he would not have,

    Shaq was the most dominant person in the league those championship years and at that age kobe did not have the experience to lead a team to the championship, you see what happened after Shaq left.

    Year1 Lakers missed the playoffs

    year 2 Lakers up 3-1 against Phoenix in the first round and still lose that series

    year 3 Laker lose first round again to Phoenix again

    year 4 now with Gasol they make it to the finals and last year they win it,

    But you can see if it was not for Shaq or Gasol for that matter you might have Kobe with 0 rings but at the very least he would not got those early rings without Shaq.

  • 1 decade ago

    probably not. Shaq was a beast during those three years. Kobe was the extra boost Shaq needed in order for the lakers to win championships.

  • 1 decade ago

    Yeah, during Kobe's rookie year it was all Shaquille O'Neal. Basically Shaq was the MAIN and Kobe was like a WINGMAN, kind of like Kobe and Pau Gasol

  • 1 decade ago

    no. the lakers are having problems repeating right now, how much more back then wherein the west was packed with talent. plus, teams kobe is playing always have issues within the team, specifically the shots taken. he won his first ring alone against an eastern team that had no experience whatsoever in the finals. it wasn't even much of a challenge for them

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • well yes and no, who knows if the lakers didnt get shaq they may have sucked bad enough to get duncan, but kobe has a huge ego and wasnt the best player and still isnt

  • ?
    Lv 4
    5 years ago

    Nah. Kobe and Shaq went hand and hand in those championships. specifically because of the fact your midsection can't do what he needs if he ought to do all of the artwork. dissimilar the scoring needs to be unfolded. I doubt James ought to win by potential of his lonesome. you choose a sturdy interior presence to win. look into all of the Championship communities. you need to have a sturdy vast guy to win and that's what Lebron's communities have lacked. BQ: OKC Thunder wins

  • STEWIE
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    Would've won in 2002-3.

    While Snaq was practically taking the season off, he led the Lakers in scoring at 30PPG and 32PPG in the playoffs.

  • 1 decade ago

    duhh. cause he thinks hes all that when really hes not

  • 1 decade ago

    KOBE KOBE KOBE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOO HOO

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.