Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Arts & HumanitiesVisual ArtsPhotography · 1 decade ago

Do I upgrade my DSLR?

I've had my Canon 350D for about three years now, and I've been thinking of upgrading to a 500D.

The reasons for upgrading - better all round camera in terms of specs, and also has video which I would use. Though I have seen reviews and they the video program isn't particularly great. The camera is supposed to be very similar to the 450D.

Part of my wants to stick with the camera I have, and with 8mp I don't see why I need more if I'm not printing on huge scale. I'll be going to uni this september, and it'd be interesting to see what equipment others have, and if I can achieve better photography sticking by my humble starter (yes I am a bit competitive).

Main thing though, is it worth going to to hassle of getting hold of a new better camera, if it might not improve my pictures anyway?

Update:

I have aquired the knowledge of how to use my camera, so it wouldn't be a case of jumping to the next stage too quickly. I am aware it is about the photographer not the quipment, but the point I think I'm trying to get at, is that somewhere down the line I probable will need a camera with better specs for the uses of printing big etc.

Thanks to everyone for answering, it has reassured me to stick with my 350d

Update 2:

I do have a canon ef 50mm, it was cheap but highly reviewed and it's definitely a sign of choosing extra lenses over a new camera

9 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I am going to take a view that I think is different than most here.

    I agree creating great images is done by the photographer but I also think that if you move to the Canon 500D or the just recently announced 550D then it could very well be worth it.

    Below is a link that lists your present camera (450D) side by side with the 500D and the 550D so you can compare features and specs. This web page also has links to reviews of the 3 cameras that include sample images from the cameras. You will gain a greater high ISO range and ability with the newer models for one thing.

    I say go for it if you want to. I think you are making a leap that will get you some worthwhile gains.

    And coming from a Nikon user like me, that has to count for something.

    Mark

    marksablow.com

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Shan't repeat all that's been said about the photographer not the equipment.

    350D to 500D isn't really much of an upgrade, you get much of the same problems, lacking a rear control wheel, lack of second curtain sync, pentamirror viewfinder, plastic construction, low frame rate...you also lose the secondary LCD screen displaying shooting info in favour of using the large LCD which eats up battery. All in all you won't get a better user experience from a 500D, and you will feel as stunted.

    You're better off upgrading lenses, getting a flashgun or a battery grip. Since you have the cash for a 500D, you might consider the EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 or perhaps the EF70-200mm f4L. Plus you may want to have a look at a 50mm f1.4 USM too.

    A battery grip will also be useful when working in portrait orientation, and a flashgun will open up a whole bunch of options too.

    Basically upgrading your camera should be done in time, and to a more serious piece of kit, such as a 40D or a 50D.

  • EDWIN
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    Repeat this 1,000 times: "It isn't the camera, its the photographer." Now repeat it another 1,000 times. Beginning to get the idea? Someone somewhere will always have the (supposedly) latest and greatest equipment. If you buy a 50mm f1.4 lens they'll buy a 50mm f1.2 lens. If you buy a 5D Mark II they'll buy a 1D Mark IV or 1Ds Mark III.

    At the end of the day all that really matters is who has used their equipment to make the best possible pictures. It will, of course, be the person who has the greatest knowledge of light, composition, exposure and the skill needed to use that knowledge to make the picture.

    If you are really in need of video capability then look at the Canon T2i, also known as the 550D.

    If you think your 350D is old, check out this picture I made:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/drifter45h/4504341818... Taken 4-6-2010 using a Minolta XE-7 35mm film camera, from around 1974, and a Minolta 21mm lens. Kodak Ektar 100 film. Print scanned using an HP Scanjet 4850 flatbed scanner.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    The 350D is a great camera and if you're only wanting to upgrade for a bit of willy waving then you're wasting your time and money. Someone else will always have better kit than you. Spend the money on a new lens, a filter set, whatever, learn to use them properly and concentrate on the job not the tools.

    The video capability of the new cameras is rubbish. It's better than nothing but with decent enough HD video cameras coming in from about £150 then if you want to play with video get one of those.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    it is talent that maked a pic, NOT the equipment...

    i thought that when i moved from a bridge to a DSLR... since having my DSLR, my abilities have improved significantly that i can take some pretty stunning shots with a point and shoot i bought...

    really, learn the basics and get stuff working with your existing camera and only upgrade if you TRULY need to... but if you do it right, you won't need to, unless your camera falls apart...

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    For video get a well-specced camcorder. For stills stick with what you have got, you wouldn't notice so much difference in a slightly higher model - get inspired, don't get kit!

  • 1 decade ago

    so you know that it is the photographer, not the equipment, so no reason for me to also point that out.

    but I will say this, I wouldn't upgrade to a 500D, I would upgrade to a 40D

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    camaera wont improve your pictures that much, its the way and subject that matters, stick with what you have for the time being

  • ?
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    why don't you just keep your camera and buy a white L lens to go with it.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.