Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
does anyone know of any websites that talk about some wikipedia link giving someones computer a virus?
i need it for a essay that's due tomorrow morning. and i want to see if it's ever happened to anyone.
i don't want to look all over google, yahoo, and bing for it because it will take all night and i wont get any sleep. if nothing like that has happened to anyone, i want to know now so that i can find another topic and get to sleep
2 Answers
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
Thinking about this simply, Wikipedia is a fully editable source. Meaning, it is possible for a user to put a link in there to another site that may or may not be malicious. This isn't Wikipedia's fault, and would be caught after 1-4 days.
Although, I have never had it happen to me, because I barely use Wikipedia as is. That doesn't mean it hasn't happened or isn't going to happen.
- EddieLv 51 decade ago
Christopher is basically correct, in that the "sacred" open and instant editing regime on Wikipedia makes it all too possible, perhaps even likely, that someone has included a link containing malware on Wikipedia at one time or another. However, I too am unaware of any specific incident where this has actually happened. In a weird way, Wikipedia's all too open editing policy might serve as a form of protection, in that hackers may consider Wikipedia to be a way too easy target, and therefore beneath their contempt and not worth the effort. That could go a long way toward explaining why such a easy target isn't full up with viruses.
However, it is incorrect to assume that a malicious link would necessarily be removed within "1-4 days". It is an urban legend that Wikipedia has a fact-checking crew that eventually checks every edit to articles. In fact, Wikipedia has never had any peer review process; whatever corrections are made are done by people randomly showing up and happening to catch it. Indeed, the 800 or so active admins are a grossly inadequate volunteer workforce to check on every edit, particularly when edits are coming in every few milliseconds.
Source(s): http://nostalgia.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges