Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Is 3-2 a pitchers count or a hitters count?
and why? I was told that anything with 2 strikes is a pitchers count and anything with 3 balls is a hitters count, but what about a full count? I even heard someone say that a 2-2 count is a hitters count!
3 Answers
- Ms InformedLv 61 decade agoFavorite Answer
You could ask this question 10 times and half the people would say "batter's" and half would say "pitcher's".
Generally speaking, the counts are divided like this:
Hitter's Count: 1-0, 2-0, 2-1, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2
Pitcher's Counts: 0-1, 0-2, 1-2, 2-2
0-0, and 1-1 are neutral.
On a high-school or college level the 3-2 pitch is pretty much always going to be a fastball. But inside the major league, it depends on the specific pitcher/batter combo.
Still, statistically, the full count is the time when the next pitch is most likely to be in the strike zone. About 80% of the time the pitch in the strike zone.
This 3-2 count is also the time when the batter is most likely to put the ball into play--about 35% of the time. (Remember, the best hitters in baseball only get a hit at 30% of their bats.)
If a pitcher only has one money pitch, he will most likely throw that pitch on the 3-2 count. Since the batter has presumably studied the pitcher, he can predict the pitch.
It gets complicated though, because at an MLB level, pitchers are trained to do the opposite of what is expected, so they may deliberately not throw the expected pitch. On top of that, the really great pitchers have multiple money pitches. The 3-2 pitch might be any of three possible pitches.
In addition, the pitcher has presumably studied the batter he is facing, and knows which pitches the batter will chase, knows if the batter has a poor sense of the strike zone, and knows that batters in general swing more on 3-2 pitches than they do on 2-2 pitches.
To complicate things further, it matters how many outs the team already has. My niece's favorite statistic is that at 2-2 count with 2 outs the pitch will only be a hit 20% of the time. She sees it on the scoreboard and yells, "2-2 and 2, people! Nothing's gonna happen!" It also matters how many men are on base, and whether it is the top or the bottom of the lineup. Sometimes a walk matters more than other times.
So if I was forced to pick one answer I'd say "hitter's count", but when you're actually watching a game, it depends on the specific match up.
- manspeakerLv 44 years ago
without understanding what the placement is, I supply the hitter the typical benefit for motives pronounced by utilising Nate. If a baserunner's on 0.33 with under 2 outs, I a great deal prefer the hitter through fact a wild pitch (or exceeded ball, reckoning on how the pitch is scored) no longer in basic terms walks the batter yet in addition enables the runner to attain. Bases-loaded circumstances are even worse for the pitcher through fact the ball would not even might desire to be a wild pitch with a view to tension the runner domicile. If there are 2 outs and a minimum of 0.33 base is open, I supply the pitcher the typical component through fact the worst that could take place from a ball is the batter reaches base without assure of scoring. All different circumstances pass decrease back to my preliminary assertion.