Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 1 decade ago

Is the reason that Democrats killed the Space Shuttle Program so they could have NASA perform Muslim therapy?

NASA plans more outreach to Muslim countries

WASHINGTON — NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden said Tuesday that President Barack Obama has asked him to “find ways to reach out to dominantly Muslim countries” as the White House pushes the space agency to become a tool of international diplomacy.

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/news_space_thewri...

Update:

FlSwampboy: Sorry to burst your bubble but you're wrong:

Obama Plan Kills Constellation Program

President's Budget Says NASA Program Lacks Innovation

With the shuttle program set to end this year and the constellation program now canceled, it is not known how long the gap will be until the next manned spaceflight program. There are only five more shuttle launches planned.

President George W. Bush proposed the moon mission after the 2003 space shuttle Columbia disaster. NASA has already spent $9.1 billion on the program.

The constellation program, consisting of the Ares rocket and the Orion capsule, was determined by a space committee to not be sustainable. The committee also decided the program was behind schedule and over budget. The program was intended to carry astronauts to the moon and mars

http://www.clickorlando.com/technology/22398786/de...

Obama+Democrats =Bad for America

13 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Obama wants NASA to stop spending money on space exploration an instead use it to hand weave flying carpets. Obama is a lunatic!

  • Karen
    Lv 4
    5 years ago

    First of all, because it is time. The Shuttle is today the oldest flying manned spacecraft. Really. The Soyuz maybe looks still the same as it did in 1986, but was internally constantly upgraded, with the Soyuz TMA-M version being in space for its first flight currently. The Shuttle got the last tiny upgrade around 2000, the last big upgrade was in 1987, and still, the Space Shuttle is full of terribly obsolete technology, that is just very hard to be replaced without designing a completely new Space Shuttle. For example the SRBs still rely on 8086 processors. Next, the Space Shuttle is a very limited spacecraft itself. Like Soyuz, which is build as taxi to space stations and back, the Space shuttle was made to build stations or other spacecraft. When the NASA budgets cut reduced more and more, all the other fun stuff was thrown away and only the Space Station was left. Next, the goals changed - the USA want to fly to Moon or Mars (this changes every year), and the Shuttle can't do that, it can't fly further away from Earth than 600 km and can't reenter directly at higher speeds. It is even too expensive for developing new spacecraft while operating the Shuttle at the current budget plans. NASA has the biggest funding of all spaceflight agencies at 18 billion US per year, but still, for what NASA does and what is expected from NASA, this money is nothing. Really. If you would reduce the US Department of Defense Budget by 1%, you could multiply the NASA budget by five. NASA is pretty much the stepchild of all US governments since Johnson. Since Nixon came into power, politicians reduced the budget and increased the demands - when NASA was successful, politicians came around to bath in its light and reduce the budget, when things got tough, NASA was punished by harder budget cuts. So, if you have no money, despite having a 18 billion budget, you need to save money. You need spacecraft that can be operated for less money and are less limited. The original Augustine plan, that Obama embraced, to give much more money to private companies developing capsules (6 billion for 4 years back then), would have been the most economic, but since the spaceflight experts of congress are total dilettantes, this budget item was reduced to 250 million in total, just enough to hire the five Soyuz capsules that NASA wants to buy for bridging the gap until NASAs own spacecraft can fly.

  • ?
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    On January 14, 2004, ten days after the landing of the Mars Exploration Rover Spirit, US President George W. Bush announced a new plan for NASA's future, dubbed the Vision for Space Exploration.[40] According to this plan, mankind would return to the Moon by 2018, and set up outposts as a testbed and potential resource for future missions. The Space Shuttle will be retired in 2010 and Orion may replace it by 2015, capable of both docking with the International Space Station (ISS) and leaving the Earth's orbit. The future of the ISS is somewhat uncertain—construction will be completed, but beyond that is less clear. Although the plan initially met with skepticism from Congress, in late 2004 Congress agreed to provide start-up funds for the first year's worth of the new space vision.[41] --- Wikipedia

    Your theory can only hold true if you admit that Bush and the Republican Congress are all part of the evil conspiracy. Weird question.

  • Pygar
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    The remaining shuttles are too old to be safe. And it is getting harder and more expensive to keep trading out the flightworthy "guts" from one to the other to keep up the illusion of an operable fleet. The Space Shuttle has never been about exploration; it never goes anywhere a Mercury capsule couldn't.

    The Republicans canceled Apollo as quickly as they could, because Democrat Kennedy set forth the goal of going to the Moon. They even changed the name of the space center back to "Canaveral". When was he ever President? And the (ahem) less educated examples of the breed like to pretend they never went to the Moon at all. In justice, I admit that uneducated Democrats fall for this too. Hang out on YouTube, there's a whole cottage industry related to altering, forging, and misinterpreting NASA footage. You couldn't get one of them to go to clavius.org at gunpoint-- anything they can't understand must be a "Shill site". Kinda like 9/11 Truthduckers.

    So if the Democrat party had done this, it would be no more than simple justice. But in truth, these third-of-a-century old 8-bit kludges have simply got to be retired. Let's face it, when foam can get through your hull, it's time for a new spaceship!

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    The article was not all that long, why did you "cherry pick" when you could have posted the entire article?

    t

    NASA chief Charlie Bolden

    NASA chief Charlie Bolden

    WASHINGTON — NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden said Tuesday that President Barack Obama has asked him to “find ways to reach out to dominantly Muslim countries” as the White House pushes the space agency to become a tool of international diplomacy.

    “In addition to the nations that most of you usually hear about when you think about the International Space Station, we now have expanded our efforts to reach out to non-traditional partners,” said Bolden, speaking to a lecture hall of young engineering students.

    Specifically, he talked about connecting with countries that do not have an established space program and helping them conduct science missions. He mentioned new opportunities with Indonesia, including an educational program that examines global climate change.

    “We really like Indonesia because the State Department, the Department of Education [and] other agencies in the U.S. are reaching out to Indonesia as the largest Muslim nation in the world. We would love to establish partners there,” Bolden said.

    As a presidential candidate, Obama espoused a space program that invited more participation from the international community and Deputy NASA Administrator Lori Garver said recently that the next time NASA lands on the moon it would be part of an international exploration effort.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Did not work very well at Ft Hood, Ark Recruiter Office, Maryland Military Base....

    Barry 0 has a problem with "enemy identification"

    Seems he thinks AZ is a bigger threat than actual Murderers.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Actually, the Shuttle program was targeted for shutting down by the Bush administration mainly due to the aging fleet and our nation's desire to explore deeper in space.

    Obama has increased the deeper space exploration program.

    But let's don't get facts in the way.

  • 1 decade ago

    Yes, another move by Darth Vader. Hello yes, I'm serious.

  • Sophie
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    Mostly to kill American Exceptionalism. The Muslim thing is like funny zinger Obama wanted to add in there.

    You stupid Americans don't realize the President of the USA truly hates our country.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Orlando = Limbaughville.

    They're Disney-toons down there.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.