Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
triangular square pentagonal numbers?
Triangular numbers: n(n + 1)/2
1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, 28, 36 …
Square numbers: n²
1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36
Pentagonal numbers: n(3 n - 1)/2
1, 5, 12, 22, 35, 51, 70 …
Lots of triangular squares (e.g. 36)
Lots of square pentagonals (e.g.9801, 94109401)
I conjecture there are no triangular square pentagonal numbers. Machine search out to around 10^16 puts a lower bound on such a number (and that took a LONG runtime). Can anyone give me a proof, though? I think this would need some quite deep mathematics and would actually be a significant result, if that's any incentive.
Figurate numbers: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FigurateNumber.html
UPDATE: yes, I meant other than the trivial result of unity.
UPDATE 2: gianlino, thanks, last time I checked Mathworld that entry either wasn't their or I missed it. It's a satisfactory answer, and it seems like the conjecture is correct.
3 Answers
- gianlinoLv 71 decade agoFavorite Answer
There is a list triangular pentagonals and it increases very fast.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PentagonalTriangularN...
"1, 210, 40755, 7906276, 1533776805, ... (Sloane's A014979)."
The induction rule is N_k = 194 N_(k-1) - N_(k-2) + 16 with N_0 = 0 and N_1 = 1.
Similarly for triangular squares, the induction rule is
N_k = 34 N_(k-1) - N_(k-2) + 2 with N_0 = 0 and N_1 = 1.
To show that these 2 sequences don't intersect after 0 or 1 is hard. However according to
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PentagonalSquareTrian...
this has been done.
- MathsorcererLv 71 decade ago
Yes, there is one triangular, square, pentagonal number--1.
Of course, that is the trivial result. I know you want a different one; I am looking into it at this time.