How lucky do we feel that we didn't get into a nuclear when Bush was in office?

This question reminds me of the Reagan / Carter campaigns when Carter all but claimed Reagan wanted to blow up the world. Instead Reagan was instrumental in ending the "cold war". We were no more likely to get involved in a nuclear war with Bush in office than were are with Obama.

Actually,now is the time to be concerned.0bama is damn near ignoring the Iranian Nuclear Program,and pushing N. Korea to show the world what a "Manly Man" he is.This guy is such a total ******* amateur.

RWE

Luck had nothing to do with it.

The fact is I am more concerned with Obama in than I was with Bush in.

As much as I hated Bush policy, Obama is just an extension of it with fewer people advising him.

He couldn't even pronounce that ****, so of course. However even as a half-*** democrat, I'm not so sure about this guy either. I'm just glad we had no powerful enemies back then.On a lighter note, we put our collective foot in Iraq's ***!

I guess they don't even teach history in Socialist School anymore.

Sad, very sad.

ROFL

Since 911, which was planned during the Clinton Administration, I've felt more safe from foreign threats than at any other time in my life, but thanks for asking.

At least we had a leader with a backbone then.

At least he would have know WHEN to push the button. Obama would nuke our allies before he would his muslim brother terrorists.

Don't you mean "nucular"?