Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Who would you rather have?
RVP or N'gog?
Cesc or lucas?
Doesnt this prove that Arsenal are better?
10 Answers
- Magic 8 Ball™Lv 41 decade agoFavorite Answer
Torres or Chamakh?
Gerrard or Wilshere?
You're comparing some of Liverpool's worst players with Arsenal's best.
- muffinsLv 51 decade ago
Arsenal are better than Liverpool, quit it.
edit: " would actually prefer N'Gog to van Persie"
LMFAO. Apart from score 73 goals and assist 37 in 199 appearances, nothing at all. One of the most technically gifted players in the PL, N'gog can only dream.
edit: Comparing Van Persie and Torres is a bit silly. They are very different strikers. Contributing to 110 goals (either scoring or assisting) isn't bad at all for someone who has had major problems with injuries. In a full season where he went injury free, he scored 20 goals and assisted 13. Not mentioning last season where even though he was injured, managed to score 10 and assist 8. Bendtner>N'gog let alone Van Persie.
Source(s): O and just remember, the time he's been here, he hasn't ALWAYS been our first choice striker ;) O nooooooooooooo karthi please don't appear!!!! He'll accuse us again. - The ProblemLv 51 decade ago
I would actually prefer N'Gog to van Persie. Seriously...what exactly has van Persie done that makes him so great?
Edit: 70 goals in 200 games is actually quite a bad record, when you're a top four club's main striker. Torres, for example, has 57 goals in 82 games for Liverpool.
Edit: All I heard was "excuse excuse excuse". Literally any Premier League striker could score 70 goals in 200 games if he was Arsenal's first choice striker.
Edit: Oh, what a surprise, here's Karthi arguing exactly the same cop-out argument as Zana! I didn't see that coming. Where's Chig?
- 1 decade ago
Van persie is better than ngog cuz he has more experience and has good skill. he has done so much for arsenal and we haven't really seen ngog do much because he is only 21.
Cesc fabregas is better than lucas, for arsenal fabregas is amazing but for fabregas' country he didn't do that well, i havent really seen lucas play a lot of games for liverpool or brazil, ive seen him play and it i would compare fabregas to like xavi or david silva, and i would compare lucas to david silva or de jong
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
lmao @ bizzare: RVP is not only a goal scorer but also a playmaker.
He contributes goals /assist nearly every game. Look at his record for the last 3 seasons
Ridiculous comparison.
- 1 decade ago
alrite this is not a fair comparision, but overall arsenal have a far better team, our cesc to their gerrard and v.persie to torres (even in the injuries) so in that respect we clearly have the better attacking mid, his stats speak for themselves. but tbh if they are both on form torres and rvp are both world class but i think rvp is more complete.
- ?Lv 61 decade ago
CESC WAS BENCHWARMER IN WORLD CUP /AND MORE SILVERWARE SPRINGS TO MIND .SO WHO IS BETTER REALLY.CAN YOU THINK OF ANYMORE TOP PLAYERS TO GO AGAINST LIVERPOOLS LOWER CLASS PLAYERS.WILSHERE OR GERRARD.
- 1 decade ago
Obviously .. They finished 4 places above Pool last year .. Says something doesn't it ?? ;-)
- 1 decade ago
ARE YOU ON CRACK SEROOUSLY LUCAS
THIS FAT BOY IN GOOGLE IMAGIES CAN DO BETTER
N'GOG
**** HIM HE COPIED DROGBA'S CELEBRATION
Cesc IS THE BEAST