Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

?
Lv 4
? asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 1 decade ago

Why do these prominent former skeptics now believe in Climate Change?

6 global warming skeptics who changed their minds

Climate change doubters have just lost one of their leading lights, as writer Bjorn Lomborg calls for a worldwide carbon tax. But he's not the first high-profile defector

POSTED ON SEPTEMBER 1, 2010, AT 2:15 PM

1. Bjorn Lomborg, Danish academic

Lomborg made waves with his 2001 book, The Skeptical Environmentalist, which argued that global warming was no big deal, and fighting it would be a waste of money. This month, he's publishing Smart Solutions to Climate Change, which argues that a global carbon tax should be imposed to raise $150 billion a year to address global warming.

Before quote: "In 20 years' time, we’ll look back and wonder why we worried so much." (2002)

After quote: "We actually have only one option: we all need to start seriously focusing, right now, on the most effective ways to fix global warming." (2010)

2. Dmitri Medvedev, Russian president

Russian leaders are famously skeptical of global warming, with then–President Vladimir Putin quipping in 2003 that a warmer Russia "wouldn't be so bad" because "we could spend less on fur coats, and the grain harvest would go up." Then Russia caught fire this summer, choking Moscow with deadly smoke, devastating agricultural production, and convincing Medvedev and other leaders that perhaps global warming is a threat, after all.

Before quote: Climate change is "some kind of tricky campaign made up by some commercial structures to promote their business projects." (2009)

After quote: "Unfortunately, what is happening now in our central regions is evidence of this global climate change, because we have never in our history faced such weather conditions in the past." (2010)

3. Michael Hanlon, British science journalist

Hanlon, science editor for The Daily Mail, was a self-professed skeptic on climate change until a recent trip to Greenland, where he witnessed the accelerated disintegration of the country's massive ice sheet. A few days on the melting ice floes, he says, "is certainly enough to blow a few skeptical cobwebs away."

Before quote: "Global warming, indeed much of environmentalism, has become a new religion. Like the old religions, environmentalism preaches much good sense, is well meaning, but has a worrying lack of logic at its core." (2000)

After quote: "I have long been something of a climate-change sceptic, but my views in recent years have shifted. For me, the most convincing evidence that something worrying is going on lies right here in the Arctic." (2010)

4. Michael Shermer, publisher of Skeptic Magazine

In 2001, Shermer hosted a Skeptics Society debate on global warming, prompted by Lomborg's Skeptical Environmentalist. He sided, predictably, with the skeptics. Then he looked at the science, and in 2006 reached a "flipping point," acknowledging the "overwhelming evidence for anthropogenic global warming."

Before quote: "Scientists like Bjorn Lomborg in The Skeptical Environmentalist have, in my opinion, properly nailed environmental extremists for these exaggerated scenarios." (2008, referring to 2001)

After quote: "Because of the complexity of the problem, environmental skepticism was once tenable. No longer. It is time to flip from skepticism to activism." (2006)

5. Gregg Easterbrook, American journalist and author

Easterbrook was an early skeptic of global warming, writing an influential book, A Moment on the Earth, in 1995 that was dismissive of mankind's role in climate change. By 2006, he'd been swayed by the decade of climate research, and wrote an essay entitled "Case Closed: The Debate About Global Warming is Over."

Before quote: "Instant-doomsday hyperbole caused the world’s attention to focus on the hypothetical threat of global warming to the exclusion of environmental menaces that are real, palpable, and awful right now." (1995, PDF)

After quote: "The science has changed from ambiguous to near-unanimous... Based on the data I'm now switching sides regarding global warming, from skeptic to convert." (2006)

6. Stu Ostro, Weather Channel senior meteorologist

A recent survey found that many meteorologists and TV weathercasters are skeptical (or even "cynical") about anthropogenic global warming (AGW), and Ostro used to fit in that camp. Now he regularly explains the connection between man-made climate change and the extreme weather roiling the world.

Before quote: Large swings in temperature "happened long before humans had a chance to influence the environment, [and] typically occurred within a 10-year period, indicating that drastic climate change can occur through natural means, and quickly." (1999)

After quote: "When it comes to skepticism about AGW, you could say I have street cred,&quo

Update 2:

"They want grant money." -- Only one of these people is an academic.

Thanks for playing. Try again.

12 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    sorry but reality proves the answer to be,......money talks!!! Just ask the libs Rangel and Waters!!! LMAO too easy

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Why do people keep asking about this. The argument is MAN MADE climate change. Climate the world over has changed over millenia. Deserts used to be lush green lands, this all before carbon emissions. In the middle ages we had climate rise for an extended period, followed by a minii ice age, but an environmentalist chart deleted this period from the graph.

  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    what replaced his innovations? actuality only hit him. he's a youthful guy. And only found out that his little ones are going to inherit the international that he leaves in the back of. it would be stable of greater human beings in the U. S. got here to that wisdom. evaluate the Bush tax cuts, that have been thoroughly paid for by utilizing borrowing money, quite often from China, that our babies will ought to pay interest on continually. that's like we only took out a loan on their piggy economic agency, continually. and what's our reaction? "we want those tax cuts to return returned." even however the main important share is going to human beings that are already rich. We must be the dumbest, greediest, human beings ever. Our grandparents, and their mom and father, etc might in no way have carried out that. in no way. think of of the infrastructure that has been outfitted interior u.s. for the final countless many years. and what's occurring to it right this moment. it somewhat is actual shameful what we are doing with what we've inherited from those that got here in the previous us. We only seem to think of that we are "The Entitled era" who must be supported by utilizing all those that got here in the previous us, and additionally by utilizing all those which will come alongside after us. our young babies get carry of the education that we stitch. How have we more desirable our faculties presently? How have we more desirable the atmosphere presently? How have we more desirable the water high quality presently? (hint, watch GASLAND.) that's no longer no longer likely that, quicker or later sooner or later, we are going to be defined, and continually everyday, through fact the era of GREED.

  • 1 decade ago

    Naturally, because we live on a planet with a dynamic climate that is ALWAYS changing. It is a great choice of words by the "Global Warming" people. That way, they can say they were right when we hit the next ice age.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    What difference does that make?

    You can line up all the celebrities you want and it won't help.

    Until you can explain why the Antarctic ice cap is growing in direct contradiction to the predictions of the theory all you have another falsified theory whose continued defense is nothing short of pseudoscience.

  • 1 decade ago

    You are making a habit of cut and paste questions and answers. That's why I like this forum less and less. Did you run out of your own opinions?

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    They took a hard look at the facts .

    But to tell you the truth I live near the rural country side and have noticed the effects myself .

  • 1 decade ago

    As another user said a few days ago, they probably want grant money. You don't get grant money from the government if you don't support its agenda.

  • 1 decade ago

    Why?

    $$$$$$$$

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Giant solar storms are coming, so it doesn't really matter.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.