Since Bill Clinton added $1,539,684,631,121.04 to the national debt during his term that means that?

Surplus was about the reducing the deficit, not the debt. The federal government was spending less. That was because of pay-go rules and President Clinton's veto pen. In the first two years of office, President Clinton decreased non-legal-mandatory spending. Something President Bush failed to do with a Republican Congress. If you had kept on the track that President Clinton had laid, the national debt would have been gone.

If you compare the debt growth of the President Clinton and of President Bush, you will see President Clinton adding to the national debt at slower rate of 25% over 8 years compared to the 46% rate that President Bush added to the debt.

No matter, what way you cut it, President Clinton was more fiscal responsible than any Republican President.

Again, you continue to fail to understand the obvious difference between the Debt and the annual budget deficit/surplus.

Just because he added to the overall debt in his eight years doesn't mean that he didn't run a surplus in some of those years.

And while you're smirking, please explain how Bush added $4.9 TRILLION to the Debt.

Cleveland 09/15/10

Yo,..Dude,.?!? Hey,..lighten up,.!?? Olde Clinton,.may have faults,..but,..the run-a-way debt,..not

be one of them,. Remember,..in all of the times,.? Clinton presented to the American people A BALANCED BUDGET,.?!? Oh,.man,.?!! Do your home work,..Merely,.look up a few facts,.!?

George W. Bush,..George W. Bush,.?!! He wrecked the Molly B,.Go figure,.!

Eliasis Yahwehei ( The Main Man )

Multiply $527M by 3 and you get Bush's debt per day.

And Bush is the 'conservative'.

.

Those in charge now have far exceeded Clinton's spending, and every other president for that matter.

As compared to Dumbya's $7,455,788,932,2477.14 addition (+ 1.3T deficit his final year and record deficits his entire term)?

im sure bush didnt help any