Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Should Military Retirees Be Forced To Wait Until Social Security Retirement Age To Collect Their Pensions?
Due to the budget crisis.You can leave the service after 20 or 30 years but you have to wait until everyone else your age can collect social security benefits to get your pension.Here is your chance military people to prove you are motivated by patriotism and not mercenary perks.
14 Answers
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
Hello Black Car.
Are you throwing down a challenge?
Listen: No one will join up and spend more than their first enlistment if they had to wait until they are 65, 66, 67, 68, or 69 years old to begin to collect their military retirement.
The military justifies lower pay not compatible with the civilian sector by the fact that you can receive a retirement benefit after 20 years. Starting pay in the military is only $1.440 a month. OK? That's not a lot and we have to take out income tax AND social security tax out of that.
The military would have to begin to pay people a starting pay of about $40,000 a year just to get them to enlist IF there were no immediate retirement when the military service is finished.
It has nothing to do with patriotism or mercenary means.
You would not work for a company that puts you into harm's way and possibly being killed if you had to wait until you will be 68 years old in 2050 to receive both social security insurance benefits AND military retirement benefits.
Remember, friend, WE too pay Income Taxes AND Social Security Taxes. We are not getting anything for nothing. We are paying our way as we go - just like the rest of society.
Best wishes,
Larry Smith
Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Ret.)
First Sergeant
Source(s): Previous military experience of 27 years: 1961 - 1989. - Anonymous1 decade ago
No. And their pension is not a mercenary perk. They joined the service
under a contract that if they fulfilled certain requirements, they would get a
pension after so many years. They were also promised free medical treatment
after retiring and the government has been watering that down. If the government
reneges on pensions, we won't have many takers for the military. Besides the
government will next go after Social Security pensioners and anything else they
can.
The military retirees fulfilled their part of the contract and the government should
fulfill their part.
- Sandra MLv 71 decade ago
A pension is not a mercenary perk by far. Military personnel are promised a pension for successful completion of 20 years of service. Active duty personnel can receive their pensions immediately. Those who are in the reserves, typically have to wait until their are 60. Due to hazardous duty, exposure to toxins and other ailments that go with service, many vets would never live long enough to see their pensions. Why don't you sign up, do your 20 and donate your pension to charity until you hit social security age? Put your money where you mouth is.
- ADLv 71 decade ago
Or, we could do like South Korea and have mandatory conscription. Along with that, we could pay conscripts about $15 a month while treating them like crap. Instead of complaining you would be serving for beans. Aren't you glad you have the option to stay a civilian instead of worrying about being drafted like in some other countries? Besides, the military makes up less than 1% of the population and out of that small number only a small fraction of them stay in for 20 years. The savings from doing what you suggest wouldn't even make a dent.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- bailie28Lv 71 decade ago
so a school teacher who retires at 20 years of service should also wait until 72 to collect? just curious? so for the last 22 years my husband has received less pay than his civilian counterpart..and when he retires in 8 years...after 30 years of service you think he should wait 15 years to collect his pension? when is enough going to be enough for you?
- Sarah MLv 51 decade ago
I have a better idea. Let's remove pensions for those who serve a single term (or even a few) in Congress and get a lifelong retirement plan that would make all of us jealous. It should be treated like the public service job it actually is. When they leave office, they leave that fat paycheck behind, too.
Betcha they'll NEVER vote for that, though.
Source(s): Army Officer - active duty - 1 decade ago
they deserve anything and everthing they recieve. Its a truely difficult life and job choice.AND, its hard on the familys as well. These guys put it on the line (and gals).. and some (personal experience) , have memories that they dont want, dreams they dont want,and life styles they wish they could change.( PTSD)..Its an ungrateful goverenment thats the real shame here..sprayed and betrayed..Vietnam Vet.
Source(s): only stayed 3 years,,dad stayed 22. - 1 decade ago
Maybe, but how about you serve 20 years in the military and ask the same question to yourself
- CLv 71 decade ago
Absolutely not. Those who earn their pension deserve their pension the day they retire. Funny, you want to punish those who earn their money but we have rampant welfare and social assistance abuse overlooked by the government. A hood rat can permanently keep her welfare but let’s punish retired veterans? If you think about it, we probably pay out more monthly to those who abuse welfare than we do to retired vets.
- GaijinLv 71 decade ago
Any service personnel that served their country for 20+ years deserves their pension.They earned it by protecting your right of freedom of speech which you just exercised by posting that they don't deserve what they earned.
Enjoying your freedom?Thank a vet.