Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Which part of the bible is the most scientifically accurate?

A) Rabbits chewing their cud

B) Spiders with six legs

C) Talking snakes

D) Talking donkeys

E) A flood covering the entire Earth, and then draining away without a trace.

10 Answers

Relevance
  • ?
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    F) Domesticated Cattle being created before man.

    G) Making your livestock look at a striped pole will cause their offspring to have stripes.

  • 1 decade ago

    A) There are species of hares, such as the coney hare native to the part of the world were there old testament was written, that do chew a cud.

    B) Insects do have six legs. I believe you are referring to where it talks of insects that "walk on four legs" as being clean. There are insects such as the locust, praying mantis and many species of grasshoppers that use their front legs as "hands" and walk on only four legs. The Mosaic Law stated that such insects are kosher to eat.

    C) Science is already decoded much of the language of the honey bee, and is making headway on others. That Adam and Eve might have had the knowledge to understand some of the animal languages is not outside the realm of science. Scientist today are doing it. You make the assumption that the snake was speaking a human language, something not stated in scripture.

    D) See the answer for C

    E) There is evidence of a great flood.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    A. http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2008/05/0...

    B. That "insects" have six legs and "spiders" have eight legs is a modern classification. Were the Bible writers subject to modern classifications before they were even invented? I suppose Jesus should have took a bus when he traveled instead of walking then too. :)

    C. The Bible doesn't say snakes talk. The Bible says it was the devil. There are no other verses that say snakes talk.

    D. The Bible doesn't say donkeys talk. God used the donkey as a vessel. There are no other verses that say donkeys talk.

    E. Evidence for the flood is every where if one removes the bias that it couldn't happen from their thinking. And why do people think that? Because to admit the flood happened is to admit they are accountable for this sins to God, and judgment is coming. Fortunately, God provides deliverance.

    http://www.wlsessays.net/subject/j/Jesus-Christ

    As for the flood, here is but one out of thousands of articles as a place to start:

    http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v5/n2/...

  • 1 decade ago

    The table of contents is the only accurate thing in there

  • ?
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    I would go with any and all of the above. Of course, I sure you're all certain that Americans driving their cars will soon cause the world to end. And you think our side is silly. lol.

  • 1 decade ago

    F) The copywright and publishing at the introduction

    it proves were it was printed

  • 1 decade ago

    Matthew 23:33 "You snakes! You brood of vipers! How will you escape being condemned to hell?

  • ?
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    D) talkinig donkeys havent you seen shrek?

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Revelation.

    I win!

  • 1 decade ago

    All of it, and none of it.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.