Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Alternate timelines? Universes?
I've heard some debate the use of the terms "alternate universes" or multiverse, omniverse, etc..., since the universe technically covers everything, but for lack of a better word (maybe alternate timelines?), would you consider the scientific community's view on this subject as more of a possibility or would you say that it is becoming the most probable model at this point?
4 Answers
- RudyLv 51 decade agoFavorite Answer
Yes, there are different, non-equivalent hypotheses about other universes.
Regarding the classification, definition, implications and the question about predictability, testability and the issue whether this is serious science see e.g. this article:
"Multiverse Scenarios in Cosmology: Classification, Cause, Challenge, Controversy, and Criticism". in: Journal of Cosmology 4, 666-676 (2010)
- DLMLv 71 decade ago
Any potential multiverse would be a part of the universe, as the term universe means, "all together, one."
I think a lot of excited Quantum Physicists got a litle over excited when they arrived at the possibility of a multiverse. You can prove a lot of things mathematically when you plug in any values you want for undefined terms.
I'll happily change my mind if physical evidence ever comes about, but don't expect me to hold my breath.
- wilde_spaceLv 71 decade ago
There are more and more reasons to believe that our universe is just one of many. The word for the whole thing would be "the multiverse". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaotic_inflation_the...
- Edward SharpLv 61 decade ago
I'd say, "one more in a long list of scientific, logical fairy tales". When proof shows up, we'll know. Until then, we hypothesize.
Source(s): Louisville Astronomical Society