Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

consider this, 0=0, 2 x0 =0 , 1x0=0 rhs=lhs, hence 1x0=2x0, ergo 1=2 , however 1=! 2?

ergo 0 has some value other than NOTHING, ergo 0 has value? Debunk me

Update:

so, 1x0=2x0, 1/0=2/0, cant be divided by zero cause that has some unknown value= cannot divide by zero as it has some unknown value, still arguable ?

1 Answer

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    You skipped the step where you divide both sides by zero. There is a reason that zero is not in the domain of possible divisions.

    The division function is simply not defined in a manner that allows for that.

    Edit: It isn't that the value is unknown. Every function needs a definition, even a very simple function like addition. That definition tells you what domain of input values are allowed, what range of output values result, and how the inputs are mapped onto the outputs. For division, the function simply isn't defined when the denominator is zero because there is no definition that provides internally consistent results. It could have been a function like factorials where the normal definition doesn't tell you what to do with zero, but it's consistent when 0!=1, so that's how it's defined. But it isn't like that. The function is left undefined.

    Source(s): Studied first order logic, including some basic number theory.
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.