Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Could this be a clue to why the Tories haven't tackled the banksters?
It's sarcasm Paul.
FOXY, Labour did at least manage to get £3.5BN out of them, which is more than this lot have done. As for Fred the Shred, their hands were tied because of a bungle by someone else whose name eludes me.
No short memory FOXY, but Labour had no choice but to bail the banks out and the money will be paid back. Brown and Darling would both have liked to hit the banks more, but unless you get other countries on board (which is what Brown wanted to do) there's very little that can be done. If you hammer the banks in one country only, then they will move somewhere else. Bankers themselves moving is one thing, but if the banks moved then we really would be stuffed. Whether we like it or not (and I don't) the banks that lost the money, will be the ones that generate the money in the future. Until there are international banking rules in place, they are to big to hammer in the way we would all like to hammer them.
Prospero, I do like your thinking.
11 Answers
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
Perhaps it would liven things up and drive home the point if several thousands of us turned up at the party too!
I'm sure that we won't be very welcome at Battersea Evolution but we could certainly make it a night to remember for the verminous scum trapped inside!!
- alamoliciousLv 61 decade ago
I have to disagree with you again. The banks won't pull out of the country if we hit them where it hurts which is in their bank accounts. Some call it their pocketbook. Not any one of those banks would pull out of this country as they make too much money from being here and to the point that some of them would go bust if they did.
Any time a politician from any of the parties tell you this they are lying through their teeth and only because it would take money away from their bank accounts as well. The Tories, Labour, Lib/dem and all the other politicians of any of our political parties all belong in one group of people and they are all bought and paid for. Evidence of the last few decades proves this. It is fact and you, I nor anyone else can get away from that fact.
I think Foxy more or less nailed this one for you but then that isn't unusual as he is pretty good at it. He does know what he is talking about on this one. I like a lot of your answers and questions as well and they make me think you are a thinking individual. Don't agree with a lot of what you say but you do seem to be getting there and if you take away the blind loyalty to a bunch of thieves and liars you just might make it. I say the same thing to a lot on here that support a party and its original idea and ideology. Sad they have changed over the years and seem to be used as a platform for the lying, thieving, greedy individuals that now infest these parties.
Hope for better is all we can do and we need to keep voting so that one day we can get rid of them all and they will actually return to those original ideals(the parties that is) All we have today as far as our politicians are concerned is people with flawed character and morals. We CAN change that. Vote them all out and give them a wake up call. Came close this last election. That is why we have a coalition.
- stickadiddleLv 71 decade ago
The corruption just goes on and on and no doubt they would be discussing the economy and thereby qualify to claim the cost of the night on legitimate expenses.
They are no better and no worse than the last lot in power, they are like a nest of festering maggots living in a world of luxury far away from the real world.
- ?Lv 51 decade ago
A £1000 a head (backstabber's) ball, is eye watering enough to woo any MP of the British ilk, as bribery works just fine in this unjust and twisted country of ours. You wont see the Tories tackle the banksters, but neither did you see the Liebour scamsters tackle them either. Dearest and Flash had long enough on the gravy train themselves, and failed to do anything effective - though I don't remember them attending £1000 balls, they only had Ed Balls haha. Don't forget about SIR Fred Goodwin, and the way that Dearest and Flash never tackled that particular bankster.
REPLY.... You talk a load of old party politic crap, "manage to get £3.5BN out of them" indeed. The British public under Dearest and Flash have poured BILLIONS of £ more into most of the high street banks to bail them out, and I forget how much RBS owe us. You know that as well as I do - . I'm no ToryLibLab supporter, but.... ahem... you seem have got a very short memory of how much those shysters cost us when the Liebour party were in less than a year ago methinks.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- aLv 61 decade ago
Well lets put it like this, if you've got any sense and just a little bit will do, you DON'T go biting the hand that feeds you, simples.....
Edit:- For all the Thumb Downer's.
Unless your an ardent Tory or Banker I think you've probably got the wrong end of the stick, what I mean by using the phrase "You DON'T go biting the hand that feeds you".
Is
The Tories and the Bankers with this nice expensive bash are doing exactly like I said not biting the hand that's feeds em,,, both of em,,, to not do what they are doing,,, both of em,,, would be seen as biting the hand that feeds em,,, both of em,,, the Bankers and the Tories,,, in other words its mutually beneficial for and to each other.
- 1 decade ago
I wish I was rich. But I am just a sensible working man. Fed up with the waste in the public sector which I pay for. I do not care if the bankers getting millions in bonuses. I did not ask to bail them out, that was Gordon Brown's idea. I rather they paid the savers off and watch the banks burn.
Reply: I did not want to save the banks, rather save the savers. Let RBS etc go bust.
I rather vote Conservative than the useless Lib or the robbing, underhand Labour.
- Kit FangLv 71 decade ago
Believe it or not, the reason the Conservatives haven't tackled the bankers is because it makes economic sense. Of course, that's not as scandalous as 'it's because they're funded by rich bankers' so it's not going to be mentioned, but really that's the main reason. Every time a banker in this country is paid a salary of millions of pounds a hefty chunk of that goes straight back into the treasury via income tax, tax on homes or cars or other goods they buy, and so on. The same is true every time a banker is paid a bonus in this country. Putting a bonus-tax on bank pay-outs permanently would only encourage the highest-paid to go abroad, spending their money and paying their taxes somewhere else - we would lose out economically in the long run. The old idea that low taxes on businesses encourage investment and help make the government more money is still true - we need to keep these people on side if we want an economic recovery, not push them away to Switzerland or somewhere.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
The Tories need to tackle the government first. Can't stop the banksters if the governments backing them all.
- ?Lv 51 decade ago
its a sad day for democracy when the nasty party can do this so overtly, and the right wing sycophants are lacking a moral compass
- 1 decade ago
I have decided to hedge my bets.
Source(s): http://www.conspiracy.hexat.com/ Star Wars IV to VI (re IV, Money is the difference between life and death + (general message from entire saga, all must be born into freedom and those that disagree are the very, very lowest scum) Terminator I to IV (posted Winter 2011)