Evidence in Sex Offender case?

I think that since the girl is only 6 years old, with her mom in and out of jail all the time and since her brothers hate this boy, then maybe her brothers convinced her to tell the police that she was raped. Evidence of this would be that she keeps changing her story so it may have never happened but there is also the fact that she's six. The police might charge the brothers with obstruction of justice or something or for lying. the 17 year old would be innocent.

Well... the judges and jurors are very sensitive about those cases. By example, months ago, they discovered a case like 10 years ago whereto the guilty man resulted to be innocent, and he was convicted of rape without proves (only the testimony of the "victim").

The correct thing to do in this case is to declare the guy not guilty.

Guilt or innocence will be determined by any physical evidence or lack of, and the credibility of the witnesses, if a jury trial the sympathy will be with the child so a guilty verdict is likely, if it is a bench trial the person stands a good chance of being acquitted.}{

This sounds like an actual rape case where it was proven the men didn't rape her. The Duke Lacross case. She changed her story a bajillion times. She said she hadn't had sex before the alleged rape, but, had loads of semen in her that was present before the "rape", but none of it from the players being tried. You should look into it. It's an excellent of example of females lying about rape just to save face not caring who they hurt on the way.

I TAMPER WITH THE EVIDENCE AT THE MURDER SITE OF ODIN