Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

I VOTE
Lv 5
I VOTE asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 1 decade ago

The US is ill-prepared for emergency radiation but yet many want to build MORE nuclear power plants?

Most American states are not prepared to cope with a major nuclear radiation event, said a study published Monday that happened to coincide with a feared nuclear disaster in quake-hit Japan.

The survey of state health departments was conducted in 2010 and found that almost half of the 38 states that took part had no plan for protecting public health in the event of a radiation emergency.

"Most states had completed little to no planning for public health surveillance to assess potential human health impacts of a radiation event," said the study in Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, a journal of the American Medical Association.

Few states said they had the resources to test the public for radiation exposure.

"The results of this assessment indicate that in many measures of public health capacity and capability, the nation remains poorly prepared to respond adequately to a major radiation emergency incident," said the study.

"With nearly half of the responding states not having a response plan, a large portion of the US population is at increased risk should a radiological event occur within the country's borders," it said.

"Without a comprehensive plan, states in which a radiation emergency occurs are likely to mount inefficient, ineffective, inappropriate, or tardy responses that could result in (preventable) loss of life."

The survey included 38 state health departments -- including 26 of the 31 states that have nuclear power plants -- or about 76 percent of the United States.

The report included a series of recommendations for state to improve preparedness, such as "substantially" increasing education in radiation emergency response among public health personnel, boosting strategic planning and exercise scenarios for radiation release events.

State health departments also need to forge closer ties with federal agencies so that they can coordinate plans for dispensing anti-radiation drugs and testing people for radiation exposure, it said.

Japan has been grappling with a nuclear emergency since a massive earthquake and tsunami battered its northeast coast Friday.

The nuclear plants shut down automatically, as they are designed to do. But the loss of power in the area and tsunami damage to back-up generators apparently crippled reactor cooling systems.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/japanquakeusnucleardis...

Is It WISE To Build More Nuclear Power Plants When States Are Not Even Ready For a Very Real And Possible Radiation Leak?????

10 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Wind And Solar Don't emit Any Radiation.

    Sounds Like a Better Choice

  • Your
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    Its certainly not a bad idea for Local, State & Federal Governments to prepare for such events, even if they occur far far more infrequently than things like terrorism, natural disasters etc.

    With saying that, if you are just attempting to stall a viable National Energy Policy..get over it.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    So what we get from the left is

    No nukes.

    No solar in the desert (where it might actually work) to save a mouse no one has seen

    No damns cause fish want to swim in the rivers

    No wind cause birds might get hurt

    So, environtaqrds, where the *** do we get the power for you to rant on line, charge those ipads/iphonbes/electric cars etc.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Yeah because we are totally prepared for the oil spill alternative.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    They are constantly learning more about how to make them safer. Look at how many die from nuke plants compared to coal.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Maybe you should stop using electricity then, so we can reduce the energy the US uses.

    Do your part.. or you'll come across as a hypocrite.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I am completely against ALL nuclear pursuits.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Let us burn more coal then, sheesh. There is no pleasing you. I suppose your computer is powered by your sense of moral superiority?

  • ?
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    Fine.

    THen let's drill for more oil and mine for more coal.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    you dropped your caps i see at least you can learn

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.