In your opinion. About ARAB revolution. Please read?

i think its about time we stood

up to our leaders and decide to kicked them out , they are Traitors

who should be killed , they only protect their Interests and mostly america's and isreal Interests. our arab countries are so rich but Unfortunately is suffering from Poverty and Corrupt governments which is suppotring the west and protecting it, while we watch our bothers and sisters and our children get killed by them and cant do anthing about it , thats the reason why Al Qaeda existed in the first place , and hell yeah we will unite ............................. you want war we are always ready

victory for islam

long live arabia

Are we talking about greed here?

If you are accusing the leaders in the Middle East as unwilling to give up their position of financial power- I must say that yes. Money and billions of it is a supreme motivator for wanting to stay in power.

The global recession has created a bunch of malcontented citizens who are impoverished?

YES. We are everywhere.

Are the current leaders part of the top 1% of society who are holding(controlling) 99 % of the planets resources and money? Perhaps.

Will they do everything to keep it that way?

I think so.

For now, I think that the Libyan struggles are staged for our viewing pleasure.

Once the armed forces gets permission to fly over, the ground troops will follow, then military bases, then pretty soon, the entire region is opened for world trade, global corporations, travel, tourism, education, etc.(normal western style life)

The positive result will be more jobs for the people and getting the same chances as everybody else.

The downside will be the religious leaders will lose their traditional control an possible resist this and create strife and warring among traditionalists and change agents.

SO

hold on to your seats because it might be a bumpy ride from here on

Interesting Question and a simple answer.

NO

no

NO

The reason is simple.

Those dictators are not interested in sharing power with anyone.

They want to rule 100% by themselves.

The Al Qaeda part of your question is a separate issue.

I see Gadaffi and his family as a terrorists anyway. I'm sure he has financed Al Qaeda.

But he would not want them rule his country as long as he is in charge.

Its bad news which ever way you look at it.

There are other country's around the world which are worse of than Libya.

BURMA

Zimbabwe

Cheers from DOWNUNDER

The issues faced by dictators are not unique to the middle east or Arabs in particular. Politics in the region are complex. Several countries in the region are playing several sides of the fence and find it useful to support a range of terrorist groups as a means to shift public discontent at domestic policies onto perceived foreign enemies. Saudi Arabia both funds and represses Al Qaeda. Saudi troops are in Bahrain because they are more likely than the local troops to fire on protesters. Syria is one of the most repressive regimes and also one of the most generous providing support and comfort to terrorists. Sudan openly uses Al Qaeda to commit genocide in the south and in the Darfur region. Leaders in the region are quite skilled at labeling their domestic rivals as Al Qaeda and persuading Americans to bomb them.

I favor a policy of reducing trade and communication with the middle east. Oil is important, but can be replaced by renewable energy. If the resources spent on military operations in Iraq were instead spent on building renewable energy infrastructure, the US would require much less middle east oil and the source of funds for both middle east despots and the terrorists they fund would dry up. Perhaps China would step in to prop up dictators with its own troops and then Al Qaeda would face a regime that killed more than 50 million of its own civilians and would have even fewer qualms about doing the same to "foreigners" in the middle east.

unquestionably he's partly incorrect. confident it somewhat is genuine that Christianity interior the west grow to be not type to the Jews interior the previous. yet, Arabs are anti-semitic. a million) you will not detect a respected map in Arab/Muslim international places that has Israel on it. 2) The Arabs sided with the Nazis in WWII. 3) The Mufti of Palestine, who took Yasser under is wing, belong to the Nazi social gathering. 4) Jews have continually lived interior the Israel section. they did not basically 1 day take place. yet keep in mind, Muslims at the instant are not in effortless terms Anti-semetic they are additionally anti-different religions. it somewhat is basically because of the character of Islam. Islam has continually been unfold by using the sword. they are caught interior the protection stress jihad and have not circulate into the religious jihad. it somewhat is unlucky, yet genuine. perhaps after the Muslim Reformation, issues gets extra effective. basically might desire to characteristic. Muslims weren't forced to connect the Nazis. Ottoman Empire fell in WWI. Turkey? Turkey grow to be on top of problems with turkey. something of the middle East grow to be administration specially by using British. the main important reason Arabs joined the Nazis grow to be because of the reality that Germany grow to be struggling with the British -additionally France. Throught this relationship many well-liked Arabs joined the Nazi social gathering. Even the Baath social gathering grow to be derived from the Nazi social gathering. There are 2 styles of Jewish human beings that stay in Israel. a million) human beings that have been immigrated there from Europe. 2) Jews which could hint that their heritage has continually lived there ever on account that recorded heritage. Even Muhammed himself did not deny that the Jews left Egypt to the promise land. So the Jews have been continually there. mountain_laurel1183 = continually you would be wanting to be severe of authors. you're basically reading their interpretation. One clue to ensure if an author is creditable is to look for materials. what proportion endnotes does the author have? What are the materials they used? those are lots of the inquiries to ask your self. in case you spot that the author used many newspaper and mag materials than this author won't be that creditable. yet once you spot that the author used declassified government information, respected letters, and different archive cloth , than this author is creditable. you nevertheless might desire to be severe.