Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
What if the 2001-2002 Bulls had stayed together?
http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/CHI/2002...
By 2007 and 2008 they would have been something special, I think.
BQ: Do you think all this trading and free agency, like they're playing musical teams with the players, is good for the fans, or would you rather see teams stick together and see what they can become?
They are 9 deep in solid players. Any team 9 deep, all solid guys can win a championship without a super star. Look at the 03-04 and 04-05 Pistons.
3 Answers
- GreeknikoLv 41 decade agoFavorite Answer
I think they would have been a border line playoff team b/c there is really no superstar on that roster. Guys like Artest, Crawford, Chandler are good role players and it would make for a decent team if they'd stuck together but I don't see them being nearly as good as this Bulls team.
BQ : I think it's good for the casual fan. It excites people to see things like LeBron and Bosh going to Miami, Melo to NY, and the big three in Boston, etc.. It draws attention. Personally I like it when teams stay together for a long time and progress through the years.
- dangelo hLv 51 decade ago
They probably would of been a decent good playoff team.
BQ:I think it is like musical teams,I guess it is good for the fans,and usually if you keep the same team together,it sometimes doesn't workout.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
WHY?? LIVE IN PAST? THIS BULLS TEAM WILL MAKE FINALS VS LAKERS
