Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Will they ever legally "prove" that Lance Armstrong took EPO?
Lots of accusations, but to date, no credible evidence seems to be available?
This question has nothing, at all, to do with his subsequent work with his foundation for cancer research. The bottom line, is just like in baseball, if you have to 'cheat' to perform at a higher level it reduces their winning or success significantly. BTW, just because he was able to avoid detection does Not mean he was clean!
4 Answers
- MtrlpqbikerLv 710 years agoFavorite Answer
Other athletes have been convicted of drug use without ever having tested positive. The lack of a positive test will not prevent him being found guilty if enough of his ex teammates testify against him. When people are saying this in front of a grand jury where they can be prosecuted for perjury if they should lie under oath, things are somewhat beyond accusations
- 10 years ago
Give the guy a break he had cancer for god's sakes. If he did use that drug it's only fair because everyone else didn't have cancer bogging them down. BTW I am not a Lance Armstrong lover. I think he's a d-bag for leaving his wife.
- Vinegar TasterLv 710 years ago
After 10 years, I don't think so. And if he is clean, then there's nothing to prove.
If "everyone " was cheating, then everyone had an equal chance to win. He still won.
