R&P: If you could have one artist "banned" forever, who would it be?

Any one who uses auto tune to excess!

Then there's Britney Spears,I mean she contributes in no way to her albums,just stands there,looks pretty and sings,also she doesn't actually sing on stage any more,just lip syncs.

Sorry but if you can't actually sing the stuff live on stage,then you have 0 business performing because(thanks to today's technology)anyone can sound good in the studio.

Also there's Kesha,what she does can't be called singing,it's talking with auto tune.If you take away the auto tune and all of the fancy computer effects from her songs(Kesha doesn't actually use real instruments for her recordings,just computers)and you'd be left with...no song at all!

Let's not forget Bieber:

1.Where would he be if not for a chance viewing on You Tube?

2.Also let's not forget the fact that Bieber never actually paid his dues as an entertainer/artist.

Limp Bizkit

Justine Beiber

Miley Cyrus

i would never have an Artist "Banned"..I mean Gee..does that make any sense?..If you don't like a particular Artist/Song..etc...there's always someone who does!.. Don't listen to them...Don't let your Kids listen to them...Change the station..WHATEVER!! Like it or not, in America they are protected by the First Amendment you know!..

Kesha. If I were given the chance to have her and gadafi in a room both tied to chairs and only one bullet in a gun, I'd shoot her, and beat gadafi down with the gun.

Wait, never mind, I want Kesha to have a More painful death. So Gadafi gets the bullet and kesha gets beaten to death.

Although there are artists I do not particularly care for I would never go to the

extreme of having anyone banned.I couldn't deny someone else from listening to them.

I surely wouldn't want someone to ban an artist they hate but I listen to.

Lady Gaga.

I wouldn't ban any artist.

Even if I do not like their music, they still have the right to create their music.

I try to be fair to everyone.

Bieber