Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 10 years ago

Shouldn't the taxpayer stop funding scientific government research?

To those who disagree and believe that government research has been productive:

Can you even name one prominent scientist (Nobel Laureates, scientific revolutionary, etc.) that works in any of our government research labs? Just one? Or do most of them work in the private sector, contributing the most to scientific knowledge rather than the mediocre lab grunts that failed the professorship process?

Why can't you accept that the most prominent scientific laws (gravity, electromagnetism, theory of special relativity, quantum mechanics, etc.) all came from the private sector? Can you name even one scientific revolutionary law that was a result of our taxpayer funded government research?

10 Answers

Relevance
  • Mike W
    Lv 7
    10 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Government funded scientific research gave us the atomic bomb. Privately funded research gave us things like the Transistor, from Bell Labs, the integrated circuit, Fairchild Semiconductors, and Texas Instruments, the logarithmic shift register, Wang Laboratories, all things essential to the computer you're now using.

  • 10 years ago

    Of the 93 papers selected for Nobel Prizes between 2000 and 2008, 53 reported US government funding.

    http://www.fasebj.org/content/24/5/1335.full

    Gravity is an interesting example you give. Sir Isaac Newton was a member of the Royal Society of London for Improving Natural Knowledge. This society was given its charter by King Charles II and is funded by the British Parliament

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Society

    Special Relativity is another interesting suggestion since Einstein proposed this in his PhD thesis while studying at the publicly funded University of Zurich.

  • Strega
    Lv 7
    10 years ago

    Einstein worked at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, which received federal funding. The Princeton Plasma Physics Lab also receives funding and works on Fusion and built the tocomac machine. There are many more I am sure but that's just the first thing that came to mind. The Internet your on and the machine, we call them computers, that let's you do it is another.

  • 10 years ago

    "Why can't you accept that the most prominent scientific laws (gravity, electromagnetism, theory of special relativity, quantum mechanics, etc.) all came from the private sector?"

    Don't ever assume that your audience disagrees with a question that you ask.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • ?
    Lv 4
    10 years ago

    Einstein was a public servant when he formulated the Theory of Relativity. He was working in the Swiss Patent Office. He wasn't being paid to research physics however. The truth is that private enterprise does not invest too much in research in most countries either.

  • Anonymous
    10 years ago

    Yea, the internet was an over rated investment anyway.

    What about nuclear power? What about the piston engine? All of that came from government funded research. No, one goes into government to try and waste money. There really isn't that much waste in government spending, most waste is in our tax code.

  • Anonymous
    10 years ago

    Yes.

    Dump NASA and the US richclass engineer's club toasting working-class-paid champagne for each test rocket launch.

  • 10 years ago

    Yep total waste of money.Scientists should have to pay a 99% tax

  • Anonymous
    10 years ago

    Yes.

  • Anonymous
    10 years ago

    I would till out debt is retired.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.