Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
If you file for a claim for employment insurance (EI) benefits what will happen to your ex-employer?
If you file for a claim for employment insurance (EI) benefits after you quit your job due to your manager's harassment and bullying (and the company did not take proper actions to resolve the problem), and HRSDC and Service Canada approve your claim after conducting investigations, what would HRSDC or Service Canada do to your ex-employer? Would they just give your ex-employer a notice that you are entitled to EI benefits or would they send a warning letter and impose them some financial penalty or make them pay the EI benefit that you will receive through Service Canada?
2 Answers
- northernhickLv 710 years agoFavorite Answer
Nothing happens to the employer. They *will* be made aware of the investigation, of the results of the investigation, and of the conclusion of your claim. They will also be given an opportunity to appeal the result, or to participate in any appeal the employee may initiate.
Yet they aren't actually affected by the outcome...at least, so long as they haven't participated in the process.
If the employer participates in the process, and the EI proceeding goes to a Board of Referees, then the parties *may* be bound to the evidentiary findings of the Board. (If the Board finds that there was harassment, then the employer may have a hard time resisting that claim in wrongful dismissal litigation. If the Board finds that there wasn't harassment, this may be fatal to a constructive dismissal claim by the employee.) In Ontario there was a 2005 case, Korenberg v. Global Wood Concepts, in which the employer had fired the employee alleging misconduct, and fought the employee's EI claim on that basis. The Board of Referees found that there was no misconduct, and the employee then sued in wrongful dismissal. The employer tried to defend on the basis of the misconduct, and the Court found that the employer was not able to advance that defence again in light of the Board of Referees.
The argument *turns* on the employer's participation in the process. However, more recently, the Ontario Court of Appeal questioned whether or not it was appropriate for the Courts to accept the Board of Referees' findings even in cases where the employer does participate.
- Anonymous10 years ago
he'd probably get fired.