Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Do you think WWE SummerSlam 2011 will be good (& More)?

Now first off, the question I asked isn't the real question, it's a question to attract attention. The real question is a list of things that are wrong with the WWE.

This is for real wrestling fans, Fans that know greatness from worthless, know that even if WWE is the top promotion it still sucks

If you do not care about pro wrestling, or you actually think WWE is good, than either A-stop reading or B- skip to BQ

Now with that all being said, I need the non-discouraged, full-hearted, fans to read and analyze every word I say.

Problem #1- Terrible booking

Now don't you dare say booking has been good lately, yeah from time-to-time the WWE books a good rivalry/feud. But don't let 1 match/rivalry distract you from the real picture. Don't let them get away from having just one good match. (WM12 has one of the top WM matches in WM history, but is WM12 considered the best WM ever) you can't sell a PPV with one match.

here's whats terrible about WWE's booking

1- PPV cards are never fully announced until the PPV actually begins. Now don't you dare say you like a surprise. If a guy in a store offered you a paper bag with unknown contents, would you buy it for $50 without seing what was inside it first?

2- their midcard is terribly booked, it's like coveyer belt. All the midcarders keep going around in a circle, very few of them being booked correctly. And putting PPV quality, or PPV hype matches on free TV for a rating. I know eventually you will have to put midcarders or main eventers against eachother on TV. But say a TV show before PPV and the Intercontinental title changes hands. For one who's watching, and what the problem with putting that on PPV.

3- The women and the tag team division is non-existent, well the women's can have an asterisk right now, but you had one of the best tag teams in a while last year the Hard Dynasty, and you break them up only to release DH Smith, bury Tyson Kidd, and bury Natalya *until recently.

Common Misconception with Problem #1- the PG-era is responsible for terrible booking, the PG-era is a factor in booking. But it is not responsible for the terrible booking, the writers and executives are responsible for terrible booking.

Problem #2- tiny MAIN EVENT SCENE

1- Main event scene in 80's, Hulk Hogan, Macho Man, Andre the Giant, Ultimate Warrior, Seargant Slaughter, etc.

2- Main event scene in early 90's- Hulk Hogan,Shawn Micheals, Bret Hart, The Undertaker, Yokozuna, etc.

3- Main event in attitude era- The Rock, Stone Cold, Triple H, The Undertaker, Mick Foley, Vince McMahon,

4- Main event in early 2000's- The Rock, Stone Cold, Triple H, The Undertaker, Kurt Angle, Chris Jericho etc.

5- Main event in 2011- John Cena, Randy Orton, christian???, CM Punk???

The thing is we are lucky to have 2 guys consistently Main Event PPV's, and the 2 guys that do NEVER PUT OVER other guys, the odd time they do, but when you're in a position where you NEED to build new stars you can't have 2 guys crap on everyone else.

Problem #3- FANS ARE NOT LISTENED TO, WORKERS ARE NOT LISTENED TO, THE ONLY DIRECTION THE COMPANY IS GOING IS DOWN

If anyone says that either A- we are listened to or B- they don't have to listen to us, I will go insane.

Listen to it from a business aspect.

We you are selling something, which is what the WWE is doing, they are selling a product.

When selling a product, would you

A- tell the customer what to buy, even if they don't like it or want it, tell them you won't sell anything else to them

or would you

B- Meet the needs of the customer, make sure that more than 50% of you customers feel satisfied with your product.

If you choose A, you are a terrible salesman. And i think WWE actually thinks the WWE is choosing B, but the truth is from the past to the present the biggest number of followers is ages 18-35. From the past it was like that. And don't blame MMA for "stealing" the demographic. It's WWE's responsiblilty to oblige that 60% of their fan viewers, istead of going for kids who make up 20% of their fanbase.

Well that's a list of 3 MAJOR problems with the WWE now

the WQs are

WQ1-Do you think WWE SummerSlam 2011 will be good

WQ2- If you were in charge of booking WWE how would you book it

3 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    10 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    I did not read all that. My answer to your title question is:

    Not as good as Money in the Bank

    Source(s): Speaking the Truth.
  • ?
    Lv 5
    10 years ago

    you pretty much put everything up what was interesting was the main eventers of the decades!

    WQ - Yes i think it will be a great ppv cuz of Cena vs Punk

    WQ - Hard One For Me?

  • 10 years ago

    yes

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.