Who would you say won the Curtis Granderson trade of 2009?

In the short-term, the Yankees obviously won the deal, acquiring an MVP candidate.

In the long-term, though, the Diamondbacks, who acquired a 26-year old ace, has the upper hand.

If Austin Jackson and Max Scherzer actually lived up to some of the hype, I would've gone with Detroit, but that isn't the case. Scherzer has been nothing short of mediocre, and the same could be said about Jackson.

They all did

Ian Kennedy is having an amzing year with the D-Backs

Mostly Max Scherzer is having a great year for the Tigers, tho the others aren't contributing as much

Curtis Granderson is putting up amazing numbers in that shitty little league field, along with every other highly paid player on that team

Yankees.

Grandy is an MVP candidate. Austin Jackson's ceiling is a right handed Granderson anyways.

And Dbacks since Kennedy is doing very well for them

I have to say the Yankees did, Granderson is a power hitter and hes been apart of the Yankees offence all year long.

I would say the Yankees got the better deal. They gave away Kennedy who is having a great year, but they got a future MVP.

Immediate win: Yankees

Long term win: Tigers.

I think the Tigers. Austin Jackson will be one of the best outfielders in the game in a few years.

Yankees - Grandy is a MVP candidate & D-Backs - Kennedy is their ace.

Right now it's the Yankees.

What you need to do this autumn is eat healthy, and exercise by doing a lot of running every day. If you do these two things, you will greatly improve your chances of being successful in football this season.