What trends do you foresee in the power struggles between Wikipedia administrators?

In a general sense, the same trends as always, surely - namely, an increased tendency towards arrogance, hypocrisy, deception, political backstabbing, and power-mongering. If that's all you were asking, then you should ask tougher questions!

However, I suspect you're referring to an increased tendency towards morality-based conflict between Wikipedia's old-guard "free culture" types, who are short-term thinkers and want a complete lack of restrictions on their activities, and some of the newer admins who think more in the long term and can see the value of having some degree of accountability and social responsibility. If so, that's a better question, and it will be interesting to see which group (if any) gains precedence and whether or not they can maintain it, but I'd have to say the actual trend is still towards increased arrogance, hypocrisy, deception, political backstabbing, and power-mongering.

there is not any secret. Assuming you're an administrator commence in secure mode, it would supply you the choice to log in as administrator. attempt it devoid of the password. (sparkling) If this works visit purchasers and set the password. If not log in as your self and attempt changing the password. Make it confusing to wager, yet do not lose it. you will possibly be able to choose it at some point if something upsets your present consumer. as long as your individual password is confusing for him to wager ( take off any password hint) you ought to apply a similar password for the two. the different consumer may well be seen on top of issues panel/purchasers