What are your views on the neanderthal (law 'culture') UK MPs?

It is, in my researched view, that they do not represent value for money and have no qualities needed to add value to either community or country, I say this with a heavy heart and I do need to declare an interest, my name is Nathan Eakins and I'm the only person competent enough to lead this (currently) loser nazi nation. Now I know you're thinking the BNP or some other neanderthal rule is what is needed, I have two points to raise, 1) Internationally we are the bad guys (this is because of brutal behaviour by our armed forces in Iraq, Saddam pointed out that the last time the Brits ruled in Iraq they were horrible (like the movie Ghandi, when I saw it as a young I child I left that movie theatre hating the British) so what did the Brits do in Iraq, they were horrible, believe me the UK is not disliked it is despised so throwing water onto a chip pan fire (as Jim Crow loving David "Hitler" Moron did when he spoke of the death of multiculturalism as the EDL (tagline, obviously) rallied in 2010) is unhelpful to business, expats and opportunity. 2) The nonculture of law has brought the UK into a terrible vicious state, this is mostly because of envy by lawyers who have looked to America with their damaging to progress (opinion but I could chat about the meaning of life until thd cows come home) pusuit of happiness (the UK political retorts have been, 'land' (in oppose to community investment (long, lon... okay you invest in talented people (as certified (qualifications such as (example only) sailing)) who review themselves against their professional peers (this must be an issue that isn't whities, possibly in the slightest) and the returns from this community hedge funding (governement to educate all who are included in this category to be left of centre with a care mode and to reward the most inclusive and diverse hedge funds with recognition (based on percentages, not net £))) and 'family' (as fanatical, wrong, unjust and unequal (unless you ard a lawyer (or a cop)) as state sanctioned (supported) neanderthal behaviour.

I have made these points as it is my view that when the 'democratically' elected agreed to serve and represent the communities that 'elected' them (wartime rhetoric, I can bore you with the stats if you like, no, may I make my point?) they failed to attend magistrates courts to get a snap shot feel for what the challenges are (these don't need to be aired in Parliament, the UK is a tourist town) yet issues of public sector confidence by the electoriate and public sector moral are the remit of these (at best) wastes of taxpayer money. You may now applaud yourself for reading this question which, I hope, has comprehensively highlighted the ineptitude, hypocrisy, endangerment through (at the least) neglect (on occasion incitement), passionate (crap) 'political' (again long story, I'll skip it) tribalism and lack of value of democracy, or you can blame pokémon.

(Andrew St.Patrick (Deep Sky Nebulae, Future OFCOM Equity (FOE), let's face it, Foean (campaigning to remove French words from the English language, for lawyers (elected or not) to do as they are told in a transparent way and to clarify that the UK's first laws weren't written in English (reason French words are in our language), we aren't going back there, nor must the sovereign countries of FOE (formerly, because of the Yugoslav war in the 90s, Western Europe) (I could talk for miles on this subject) is away)