Do You Think 17.5 Million Of Public Money Spent On Bailiffs To Remove Some Travellers Is A Good Use?

If you look at the money in terms of this single issue then the answer is probably no. The cost is born because the law has to be applied equally to all without favour.

If you allow some people to break the law because it is too expensive or inconvenient to enforce then you will always be compromised in further decisions.

The simplest, cheapest and fairest option would have been for those 'travellers' (sic) who are now so petulantly shouting about their 'rights' to have obeyed the law from the outset. It is only because of their selfishness that the taxpayer has had to stump up so much money. The idea that because of the cost, these people should, unlike others, be allowed to break the law is ludicrous.

I sense there is more of a political rather than financial motive in the mind of the questioner here, just as busloads of others with a political agenda have been volunteering to man the fortress of Dale Farm. If you don't like the law then campaign for it to be changed by all means but please, none of this bleeding heart liberal nonsense about these 'disadvantaged' people. It is pure silliness.

When a govt is so tied up in red tape and a multitude of laws that conflict with each other then everything takes more time and costs more than it is worth & justice is denied the good men and punishment never given to the bad and evil triumphs over good which should never happen.

P

The Church did certainly use the pagan holiday date for Christmas, yet no longer so it ought to "stress conversions." extremely, Dec. twenty 5th became into the party of the days lengthening as quickly as lower back, which to the pagans meant that the sunlight god could convey mild and heat temperature to the earth, as quickly as greater. via co-opting this date, the Church made it the party of the mild of the worldwide, Jesus Christ. It wasn't carried out to stress conversions, yet extremely to make it much less complicated for Christians to rejoice alongside their pagan acquaintances without elevating suspicions that they, the Christians, have been denigrating/no longer worshiping the sunlight god, that ought to get them killed. the only conspiracy became into of the pagan officers against Christians. Easter is the 1st Sunday following Passover, in basic terms because it became into while Jesus celebrated it along with his Apostles, so there's no longer something pagan approximately that. in basic terms the call Easter comes from a pagan source, however the holiday is predicated on the Jewish calendar no longer on any Roman god or goddess worship.

HOW MUCH!! It would have been cheaper to pay them to leave the site. What services will be cut to make up for this expensive charade.That or the Council Tax will go up big time next year for the law abiding residents in the borough.

I managed to find out today that only part of the site had no planning permission, and it was built on waste land - what a misuse of council money

It would have been cheaper to napalm the pikey bastards

that money could have been sent to pakistan to fund terrorism i suppose.