Champions League T20: Why there is a non uniform distribution of teams?

Originally the tournament was made to accommodate 2 teams each from India, Australia and South Africa. Teams from other countries participate only on invitation. With Pakistan not being invited(for unknown reasons), a third team from IPL runner-up is picked.

There is a fourth Indian team this time because it has qualified to play through qualifier rounds of this tournament.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Champions_League...

because cl t20 is bcci controlled league.

everything will go according to their wish.

if they want they can even put 5 or even more than that ipl teams.

according to me the distribution should have been like that:

Chennai Super Kings, Mumbai Indians (INDIA)

South Australia (AUS)

Cape Cobras (RSA)

Trinidad & Tobago (WIN)

Leicestershire Foxes (ENG)

Ruhunu Eleven's (SL)

Auckland Aces (NZ)

(8 teams are enough as this league is about champion teams only)

there was no need to organise a qualifying tournament for the domestic t20 champion teams like Auckland Aces, Ruhunu, etc.

a million) i'm no longer helping any group. The group I help are not taking part in and that i do no longer desire to pledge my allegiance to a distinctive group purely for the sake of it. i ought to assist the Sussex Sharks as I stay in Sussex. besides the shown fact that as a Kent fan i could fairly eat my own arm than help Sussex. 2) Kent. they are an exceedingly solid, aggressive Twenty20 area with quite some large gamers. Bonus question: I easily have clicked on between the hyperlinks for curiosities sake yet i did no longer watch the tournament on the internet website.

because BCCI controls the clt20. that is why it is taking place again in India. Cricket Australia and SA cricket are its other partners.

Only BCCI is answerable to this question

Cuz icc's president power n bcci's money power.