Why do people vote BNP instead of UKIP?

As a staunch UKIPPER I am the 1st to acknowledge that everyone is entitled to their opinion, however all the other parties have got it wrong! Even yours.

A big difference between the BNP and UKIP may be the fact that we at UKIP fielded black and Asian members in the elections that we took part in and they never did, and as far as I am concerned, that speaks volumes about our intentions about whom we think that the 'British' people actually are, and that we are a forward thinking party that is without prejudice and welcomes all peoples from all colours and backgrounds. It was only recently that the BNP allowed a lone Asian (or a Seik) to join their party. The BNP and your lovely Lib Lab CON party also RECKON that we at UKIP are a one trick pony, only interested in the EU and referendums on it, when plainly we are not as we have a full range of policies just like you and they do, and take part in virtually every debate nomatter what the subject as we are clearly members of the hard working British public just like (hopefully) you and they are, and tend to voice over matters on every subject...

Since I note from your previous answers on these forums you are staunch Liebour and proud-on-it - like I once was also! It rarely seems to matter what others say anyway when they express their opinions according to many Laibour people especially, though from this question there seems to be a thawing of that freezing cold pro Blair/Brown Starlinesque exterior, and it looks like there might be hope for you even yet.

Good day Sir.

UE DIKTATORSHIPPER..... There ain't no Bilderbergers or cronies in the UKIP outfit.

I have no idea. What I do know though and it proved to be correct last Monday evening is that they both promote democracy or at the least claim to do so without actually voting on a measure that kills it dead no matter what the electorate say or want. That my friend cannot be said about the Loopy Democrats, Lying Labour or the Con-artist Tories. They proved that democracy doesn't exist in this country if it goes against what they want. Before you knock any other party maybe you should concentrate on the one of the 3 main shyster groups you support. Don't you even wonder how long it would take them to bring out the bullets and bombs to kill us with if we ever did grow a set and actually revolt. Hell man! Gaddafi has nothing on that lot as proved with their suppression last Monday night. They proved beyond a doubt that they are no different and that democracy only counts for them when it is going their way. If not then they fiddle and fudge the rules of this so-called democracy to suit themselves.

Naturally I’m very liberal but I’ve had to seriously think about defending the Britons as a race of people and even perhaps become selfish in doing it

Immigrants have come in many numbers

Immigrants aren’t going to integrate as their own communities are big enough to stick to their own kind and their own beliefs

Immigrants are more likely to be in poverty

People in poverty are more likely to breed in large numbers

Immigrants will continue to outbreed the native and the very Race which is Briton will become a minority

This is the reason why I have to vote for a party who’s willing to put the Native British first

Are there Racist policies? I suppose putting policies in place which favour the British is a policy about Race.

Do I believe this is “Racist” against other Races? No I don’t

Are there Racist members? Of course, I wonder how many extremist Muslims vote for the major 3 as they know in doing so it’ll keep them in the country and on benefits.

Labour are advocates of creating my points about immigrants and the people who say they are Racist against white people have a point

“which harms particular groups of people”

The big 3 have put policies in place which has indirectly lead to the unfair treatment of the Native British. And has done “harm” to the way we live our life.

I’m not voting for them because I feel like a victim but because I believe each country has a right to protect its own Race

UKIP haven’t the policies in place which can deal with the immigrant problem which will inevitably lead to the Briton being a minority….

If we had balanced low level immigration - which would have lead to full integration with the British - since WW2 then I'd likely be a staunch Conservative...

EDIT

“Having looked at UKIP's website I feel their immigration policies should be more than enough to appease those worried about this issue.”

It has nothing to do with their immigration policy. It’s everything to do with their lack of policy of dealing with the problems which are already here.

Even if the 3 main parties stopped immigration, alone, today - The problem would still be here and it would still grow FACT

I answered as honest as I could and you’ve responded in a way which proves all you wish to do is attempt to debate us out of our answers in an indirect wimpish way….

P.M sent also….

EDIT - PM attempted but there isnt the option

You are staunch labour. A foul party that told deliberate lies to sanction the genocide of the Iraqi people. Where the Hell do you get off criticising the British national party or UKIP. Both parties do not slaughter innocent men women and children. Do not invade other peoples country's and are totally non violent parties.

I voted UKIP . UKIP 's predictions about the cost of the EU and the disastrous structure of the Euro turned out to be correct.

UKIP was founded in 1993 as a honey trap to neutralise anti–EU activists by the Conservative party, with Nigel Farage in on day one as spoiler in chief. If as a party member you run a serious anti-EU campaign, you are ruthlessly shut down by its internal freemasonry Regional Organisers; they rig internal elections to keep effective activists out, and Common Purpose members create infighting to ensure no progress is made.

Nigel Farage has controlled the party for most of its life. He appointed Roger Knapman as leader in 2002, without an election, coercing the other candidates to stand down. On 12th September 2006 Nigel Farage became UKIP’s leader formally. He makes good, Conservative Party level speeches, insults EU commissioners. but always misses the telling facts when attacking the EU, to avoid doing it real damage. He and others also create disputes to destroy the parties effectiveness.

His printed election address, and speeches since he became leader, make it clear his main aim is to get UKIP’s MEP’s re-elected (thus ensuring their £440,000 pa salary/expenses; he gets a lot more.) As for his pretended method for leaving the EU, he says electing a majority of UKIP MEP’s would make our position in the EU untenable.

He knows that’s not true we can only leave if Westminster repeals the 1972 European Treaty of Accession and Treaty of Lisbon.

So even UKIP is a pro EU party, with its top ten leaders, all European MEP’s, paid vast EU salaries which they are very keen to protect, and all the parties’ employees paid by the EU. He who pays the piper calls the tune. Do something useful on Election Day and take your children or grandchildren on holiday your vote doesn't change anything.

Have a nose at the website and have a look for yourself.

Any answer you are given you will only say it's rubbish and lies and we are all racists anyway.

Would you be able to tell me why so many people are brainwashed into voting for the ridiculously left wing Lab/Lib/Con?

Labour are clearly a racist party, against white working class Brits, take a look in your own back yard you mentally ill tosser

The BNP are full of lies, the fact that a few have come on here and claim every other party is racist towards white people is just an example of how they are trying to turn their racism around on other people.

The reality is everyone knows they are racists except for a daft few who believe and vote BNP, as much as the BNP are trying to sell themselves every month or so the press come out with another story of a racist BNPer.

Now, the BNP did not blame Chris Hurst for giving a nazi salute, they did not blame him for saying "Sieg heil", they did not blame him for being at a concert of the norway killer's favourite band, no, they blamed the Sun for taking pictures and reporting that this BNPer was a racist. Hmm.

The BNP claim not to be racist but Griffin wanted Stephen "Don" Black to come into the UK, they even asked the Home Secretary to let in this white supremacist from the US. Put that alongside being friends with David Duke, supporting Terre'Blance, Darby being seen at a fascist meeting in Italy alongside other fascists and racists while the Hitler salute was being give, oh and that councillor who just happened to be holding a flag for a bunch of guys as they gave the Hitler salute, and so on and on and on, and EVERY TIME this happens the BNP blame the media for being against them, as if Cameron giving the Hitler salute would not get on the front page of every newspaper, of Harry dressing up as a Nazi.

Basically they are pathetic, so those people who like pathetic will vote BNP, those who dont will vote UKIP or someone else!

Even a party for racists seems more appealing for many than a party for bankers.

Joking aside, it appears UKIP forbids BNP apostates from joining.

http://www.ukip.org/page/terms-and-conditions-of-m...