TRUE or FALSE: The challenger should carry the boxing fight to the champion to win convincingly.?

It used to be that way. The champ just had to defend his title and the challenger had to be the attacker, and aggressive.

That went out a long time ago. Judges now decide. You never know now unless there is a knockout.

ok its obvious that none of you first 3 know anything about boxing. and are pac fans.

you can win without a knockout. in fact, thats how much boxing matches are won,

there is something called "counter punching" that allows you to win without being the attacker.

pac got taken to school today. proof that no matter how good you are, some fighter has your number. styles make fights, and this one was ruined by shitty judges.

what is this? amateur hour?

means marquez and mayweather would never beat a champ unless its by ko. thats just their style, theyre counter punchers

True. You don't win by slacking in the later rounds and backpedalling.

All you gotta do is to knock Pac down to win. pretty simple isn't it?

TRUE