Should I purchase purchase te MB-D11 vertical battery for the Nikon D7000 or the cheaper after market brands?

Why spend $$$$$ on an expensive high quality camera and put the whole thing at risk by attaching some cheapo nasty Chinese copy of the battery grip.

The battery grip integrates with the electronics of your camera - do you think Nikon supplied details of their electronics to the competition? No! They have had to work it out for themselves. If they didn't quite get it right you could slowly fry the electronics in the camera and when they fail the warranty will be possibly voided.

You get what you pay for - that is why you bought a Nikon D7000 and not a cheapo cheapo point and shoot. Same thing applies to the battery grip - you get what you pay for!!

OK,

1. you are not putting a camera at risk with a grip. There's companies like hahnel and phottix that have been making these things for some time.

2. when in doubt you can still use original batteries in a 3rd party grip.

I think it all comes down to why you want a grip in the first place and what kind of quality you expect. Nikon's own are build to very high quality standards. 3rd party grips often feel just a touch cheaper or don't fit as well as the nikons. Bit like Volkswagen versus audi. A lot of the design is the same but the build and finish quality is better

You have a high camera, it's better to buy a battery grip that is from Nikon because you never know if it will damage the camera, or battery slots. Trust me, even though it seems like a great deal, it's usually not!

Specs are all the same, I mean it's just a device with buttons. A fake has everything the same, but it could be just a matter of time after using it when something goes wrong.

the two issues which will make a great distinction in the traditional of your photos are a incredible Nikon flash and a e book on commencing up photos. (And a classification or 2 in case you could handle it.) to start, you could placed the digital camera on application or maybe vehicle and snap basically like a element and shoot. As you study your digital camera and progression in potential, you could start to shoot manually and use a warm shoe flash to good benefit. then you definately can start up questioning a pair of recent lens. For a great start up in low mild portraiture, i'd propose the 50mm f/a million.8. At a sprint over $a hundred, it relatively is in line with danger the appropriate bang for the dollar available. you isn't taught all approximately photos and making great photos in an afternoon, or maybe weeks or months, yet you will progression and study to produce great photos whenever you p.c., and not in straight forward terms via twist of destiny, have relaxing with your new digital camera! it relatively is a incredible one.

with such an expensive camera, you want the highest quality batteries. i wouldn't risk it. it probably isn't that much more expensive and secondly after-market batteries, from what i know, do not last as long. most are from china, (even though the manufact. also probably gets it from china) could be bad. what if the battery voltage is too high for the camera etc? are you willing to skimp out on one little thing?

it's like a 5000 dollar camera and a 100 dollar printer. wont print nice pictures. or using regular fuel on a bmw.

If you had a Porsche, would you be willing to install 13" iron cast wheels and high profile 5" wide tires? When compatibility and quality are concerned, specs and price shouldn't matter anymore.