Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
9 Answers
- MiltonLv 710 years agoFavorite Answer
A little one-celled, self-replicating critter came first and look at the mess it became after several billion years of adapting and evolving.
- Londo MolLv 410 years ago
the parents
- can't have babies without parents
If you draw a family tree of human evolution the babies would be down the bottom, the parents would be just above, and, an enormously distance away at the very top, a single 'parent'.
- John MLv 710 years ago
You already know the creationist answer.
The real answer is that we evolved from asexual reproduction to reproduction involving two separate instances of a species with independent DNA. So the first instance of that reproduction had to be done with parents that were older than the child, therefore they came first
- ( :D )Lv 510 years ago
i think the answer is baby,
becoz the parents must be baby first before they become adult and be a parents.
Source(s): i can't speak english, but i can speak engrish :D - 10 years ago
from history (according to the bible) man and woman came first, not a baby...
- Anonymous10 years ago
depends where you loo, bible adam and eve? evolution, most probs an ape which gradually turned into the humans we see today